So if we start a thread on how good he is, they'll can him? Or Kearns?Networks love that you hate a commentator. Your playing into their hands.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk HD
Because the networks think style matters more than substance. That loud excitement matters more than accuracy. That cliches are a substitute for original thought. And that being completely biased equals passion.
Apply the same to Phil Kearns x 100.
I read this thread before watching the replay and honestly don't get the Martins hate. He's there for qld flavour and does his job well.
How dare you call Marto a woman!maybe because he is ridiculously biased.
Even Kearns can acknowledge when he is putting loyalties ahead of logic.
If Marto is an expert commentator then she should act as one.
If he is a big fucking cheerleader and there for colour, then he should dress like the fool he acts.
People will then understand whatever he says should not be taken seriously.
More to the Clarke list of cliches:
What was said at half time
That's the ball game
That might be the ball game
THere's the big don't argue
(player name) gets the fend going
They won't catch (player name)
(player name) Puts on some footwork