Richo
John Thornett (49)
No, a coach shouldn't rip into his players publicly, but he does need to set the tone on accountability. I don't see the point of lamenting another one that got away when your team needed a bonus point win to be in contention. Tell the media that the performance was unacceptable, tell them that you don't consider that to be a good enough display of rugby, tell them that you won't tolerate anything except a dominant victory next week.
Granted, the media can and will quote selectively, but in the RugbyHeaven article Foley says:
- they "did a lot right in that game"
- it's "frustrating for everybody"
- very few teams win at Newlands
- he's disappointed but "proud of the boys and what they put in there"
- they had a plan to disrupt the Stormers which they went about doing "pretty well"
- they won the second half but "probably left ourselves a little too much to do after the first half"
- there may have been a few kicks that were the wrong option, but says the "boys tried to interpret the situation well"
- he's annoyed about the second ball on the field (justifiably so, IMO) and some other decisions
Not all of this is bad but to me it speaks of someone afraid to place real demands on his teams. What is so bad about saying "We did have a game plan to control territory and put the Stormers under pressure with contestable kicks, but obviously we executed that poorly." Maybe he speaks bluntly and honestly to the players and if so, good. But what most fans see is someone with their head in the sand.
Granted, the media can and will quote selectively, but in the RugbyHeaven article Foley says:
- they "did a lot right in that game"
- it's "frustrating for everybody"
- very few teams win at Newlands
- he's disappointed but "proud of the boys and what they put in there"
- they had a plan to disrupt the Stormers which they went about doing "pretty well"
- they won the second half but "probably left ourselves a little too much to do after the first half"
- there may have been a few kicks that were the wrong option, but says the "boys tried to interpret the situation well"
- he's annoyed about the second ball on the field (justifiably so, IMO) and some other decisions
Not all of this is bad but to me it speaks of someone afraid to place real demands on his teams. What is so bad about saying "We did have a game plan to control territory and put the Stormers under pressure with contestable kicks, but obviously we executed that poorly." Maybe he speaks bluntly and honestly to the players and if so, good. But what most fans see is someone with their head in the sand.