Idiot. If aussie rugby has that outlook we don’t go anywhereAnnnndddd, we didn’t let him go
Setting aside for a moment the “why are we talking about Mack Hansen in the Tahs thread” question. I think it’s a valid concern for Brumbies fans to be asking why he didn’t get more of an opportunity. The coaches are supposed to be the experts and they kept him behind a long list of people for a few years. Does anyone think Banks, Muirhead or Wright would be walk up starters for Ireland? I’m not so sure.100% Good luck to him but geez they are carrying on, also if he REALLY wanted to stay he would have done so and fought for a spot. Honestly, we can't keep everyone here and we have had plenty of players come our way.
Easy tiger.Idiot. If aussie rugby has that outlook we don’t go anywhere
Apologies just shits me that super franchises are so stupid in their selections because someone falls outside their zone. Yet tahs happy to sign welsh and kiwis etc.Easy tiger.
By we, I’m talking Waratahs (this is a Waratahs thread). apparently it was our fault he left the brumbies, went to Europe and got a cap with Ireland because we didn’t sign him after Maddocks left. That was my only point. Why is he being mentioned as a lost talent on this thread? I don’t think he had any involvement with the Waratahs. Is it a loss to rugby here? Probably. Like you I’d prefer every eligible player stay here and push the overall standard so the Wobs would be stronger. And like you, I’d prefer not to be called an idiot.
If he were a centre or lock we may have been more interested. The Tahs have 3 quality up and coming 5/8s that have been in their system for a few years, two can play fb, there are other fb candidates also. They’re all young, I’d assume they have a few years on their contracts. Why would the Tahs, who were pleading poverty last year, fork out $ in a position that could be covered in house?Apologies just shits me that super franchises are so stupid in their selections because someone falls outside their zone. Yet tahs happy to sign welsh and kiwis etc.
Because they had a 5 million surplus and he is better than any back we have.If he were a centre or lock we may have been more interested. The Tahs have 3 quality up and coming 5/8s that have been in their system for a few years, two can play fb, there are other fb candidates also. They’re all young, I’d assume they have a few years on their contracts. Why would the Tahs, who were pleading poverty last year, fork out $ in a position that could be covered in house?
Fair. But at the time, it seemed sensible to let Kellaway look elsewhere. And even then, it took him a long time to come good.Like if we were talking Kellaway, who signed early with the Tahs, went down the pecking order, contract wasn’t renewed, became somewhat of a journeyman, came back, signed with the rebels, gets called up for a wallabies squad from left field and absolutely slays it it in the wallabies jersey, THAT would be on us.
always the Tah's fault... Lets put it to bed though, he was either going to play in Canberra or in Ireland dont think any other team in oz had a chance..remind me again how the Tahs and not the Brumbies are at fault for Hansen playing in Ireland?
Does anyone think Banks, Muirhead or Wright would be walk up starters for Ireland? I’m not so sure.
You know you are losing touch when you don't even know who Hansen is.
Because they had a 5 million surplus and he is better than any back we have.
Especially when the Brumbies were already offering that.Unless taking up that contract seemed like a horrible idea, why would Hansen shop around for a low value contract at another Australian Super rugby side?
You know you are losing touch when you don't even know who Hansen is.