Adam84
Rod McCall (65)
I’ve heard injured, foot/ankle injuryMore news that Hooper won’t play till mid-season.
I’ve heard injured, foot/ankle injuryMore news that Hooper won’t play till mid-season.
I’ve heard injured, foot/ankle injury
Meanwhile, Wallabies captain Michael Hooper is not expected to take to the field for the Waratahs until the middle of the season.
Hooper is recovering from a Lisfranc injury and will not be rushed back, with the Waratahs and RA in agreement that an extended break is not a bad thing ahead of a big lead-in to the World Cup, which includes three Tests against England in July.
The one on the tahs website that has seemingly randomized aspect ratios for the headshots? It's missing quite a few players - Tizzano, Pietsch, Funa, Cridge, etc.Is Tizzano still around? I don't see him in the squad list...
Good news that Tizzano's still there - he's earned more game time.The one on the tahs website that has seemingly randomized aspect ratios for the headshots? It's missing quite a few players - Tizzano, Pietsch, Funa, Cridge, etc.
He was named in the official squad announcement, I just don't think that page has been updated in ages.
Super Rugby is becoming hilariously low budget
Super Rugby or Aussie franchises?Super Rugby is becoming hilariously low budget
I prefer to look at it as the team will develop without Hooper and when he returns will be stronger... Colman is the right guy to have in charge after two Kiwi duds.And we are off to a flying start.
Is your issue just that the have included the "NSW Rugby" text in the logo?I think the change of the logo was a mistake. I know it was a marketing move because if you call a team as a state, people outside rugby niche can see themselves as part of the team and support it (That has not happened) but in terms of a good logo, the new one looks too loaded.
I mean, if you look the last 3 logos, the 1996-2018 is the best by far. For me it's the perfect logo:
^ the SA and NZ Super Rugby sides were/are also a collective of smaller provincial sides. Whereas our teams already represent a larger state. As an example I work with a kiwi fan of Otago and the Highlanders, not the Otago Highlanders, because that leaves out Southland and North Otago. And to include them would make the name cumbersome. I of course always call them the Otago Highlanders just to annoy him.
I stand corrected. I was always under the impression they had the same system as NZ as the Curry Cup was already a thing pre Super Rugby.Not really in SA. Each of the SA franchises came from well established representative states ("Province" in SA means basically the same as "State" in Aus). Deals were done over time between non-Super provinces and the franchises as talent feeders, but they continued to play each other in Curry Cup.
Obviously is not an issue. Just in terms of marketing, probably the last Tahs jerseys are more loaded than the oldest ones.Is your issue just that the have included the "NSW Rugby" text in the logo?
You can put that in the old one and in the away jersey the letters were white:Other than that I think the new(er) logo is an improvement - the dark blue bordering helps when it's used largely on a light blue background.
The first couple of days of training would have sucked. It doesn't matter how fit you are, adjusting to the temperature and humidity differential is always going to be nasty.