I think so. I must now go and have a little rest to recover.
For all the sometimes spiteful commentary on the Tahs last year there was a very definite structure. It was a shite structure to be sure, but it was there. The issue IMO remains execution of basic skills and application to the task, but I am happy that if they execute the Tahs with this structure can do more than scrape out tight wins.
Here's what I don't get about the 'He inherited this squad' comment
I wonder how many Wallabies are playing in this comp?
Or even how many guys were selected as Wallabies last year.
Bullrush, how many of the players listed do you consider to be the best in their positions?
The question I think that no-one seems to be asking is..can Cheika get the best out of his current players?
He's picked Folau, Volavola, Chapman and now Will Skelton*. That's why he inherited his squad, the rest were not his decisions. Compare this to other 1st year coaches such as White and JK who had a say in much more of their squad.
*Secured the final EPS spot vacated by Lane
Says a bit about Atkins and Peterson
I don't think people are ignoring that question, they've just been asking it in a slightly different way: are the current players the right ones for Cheika? I think he has decided he wants to build a particular type of team, rather than cobble together what he can with the players he has. This season is about a) instituting a system and culture, and b) working out which of the current players will fit within that system and culture.
I also think people are assuming in Cheika's favour that he can get the best out of them. At this stage that's a legitimate position.I don't think people are ignoring that question, they've just been asking it in a slightly different way: are the current players the right ones for Cheika? I think he has decided he wants to build a particular type of team, rather than cobble together what he can with the players he has. This season is about a) instituting a system and culture, and b) working out which of the current players will fit within that system and culture.
If that's true then I don't think he's a good coach. It's like calling him da Vinci cos he's painting the Mona Lisa by numbers but he doesn't have the right colours. Or watching him trying to make one of those fit-together bookcases from K-Mart without enough screws and calling it carpentry.
Hell, it's like going to the Chicago Bulls in 1992 and trying to build your game plan around Bill Cartwright and Stacey King.
I also think people are assuming in Cheika's favour that he can get the best out of them. At this stage that's a legitimate position.
I wonder about a dynamic where some of these blokes know that they aren't part of his long term plans.
Love the comparisons - although the Chicago 1992 references threw me: is Bill Cartwright related to Nancy?If that's true then I don't think he's a good coach. It's like calling him da Vinci cos he's painting the Mona Lisa by numbers but he doesn't have the right colours. Or watching him trying to make one of those fit-together bookcases from K-Mart without enough screws and calling it carpentry.
Hell, it's like going to the Chicago Bulls in 1992 and trying to build your game plan around Bill Cartwright and Stacey King.
That's more than fine with me!I suspect we'll see some of the blokes off to Japan or Europe slip more and more out of favour, especially if making the finals becomes impossible.
I think that's gotta be the first time anyone ever compared a current Waratah to Michael Jordan!
I disagree with your premise. Almost all top coaches have some kind of system. They recruit and train players to fit that system. It's why coaches get influence or control over personnel -- they don't want to coach players who can't play the way they want to.