Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
waratahjesus said:The Wallaby Saviour
Would require him to be a Wallaby. Maybe an appearance in the "A" team would be good - how many "A" caps does he have BTW? :nta:
waratahjesus said:The Wallaby Saviour
That was before he porked up. The build of a 17 yo sprinter is a bit different to a 20 yo professional rugby player, by necessity. Hence, still good acceleration, but less top speed. He's shifting 10-15 more kilos.Groucho said:Lee Grant said:I think that Beale lacks a bit of pace for the spot - to chase his own kicks in the current sytle - and to take advantage of broken play.
He is quick off the mark and fast enough as a 10 or 12 over 20 metres but he doesn't have gas that is serious.
But then Hewat had a couple of good years in that position and he was hardly Usain Bolt. Maybe Beale will get away with what he has in the Super14 at fullback but I think we will wonder a few times: what if he had that extra step on the guy who ran him down?
I'm surprised. You'd think a GPS 100m sprint champion (and hurdles too IIRC) would have some serious gas.
Groucho said:I'm surprised. You'd think a GPS 100m sprint champion (and hurdles too IIRC) would have some serious gas.Lee Grant said:I think that Beale lacks a bit of pace for the spot - to chase his own kicks in the current sytle - and to take advantage of broken play. He is quick off the mark and fast enough as a 10 or 12 over 20 metres but he doesn't have gas that is serious.
NTA said:waratahjesus said:The Wallaby Saviour
Would require him to be a Wallaby. Maybe an appearance in the "A" team would be good - how many "A" caps does he have BTW? :nta:
Groucho said:I'm surprised. You'd think a GPS 100m sprint champion (and hurdles too IIRC) would have some serious gas.
Lee Grant said:Groucho said:I'm surprised. You'd think a GPS 100m sprint champion (and hurdles too IIRC) would have some serious gas.
I wasn't a great time IIRR, because I looked it up at the time, and it wasn't the senior year - again IIRR. Pete Betham was heaps faster than Kurtley at Joeys and so were Lachlan Rosengreen (Grammar) and Lachie Turner (Newington); so they couldn't have been on the track.
Ishmael said:You a GPS lad Lee?
Lee Grant said:Ishmael said:You a GPS lad Lee?
No - my family went to NZ the year I started high school and I was there for about 7 years (in the country, I mean. :lmao My two sons, brother-in-law and his kids went to Joeys - and I became a Joeys tragic. I saw Kurtley when he was 13 in a trial game, before they scooted him up to the 15s, and my jaw dropped. Joeys had a good team in his 3 years in the Ones and some of the rugby they played was a joy to watch.
Agree on your analysis of the selection issue. As I said a while back on this thread: my preference would be Barnes 10. and Beale 12. but just mentioned that Hangers shouldn't be written off. He hasn't set the world on fire when he's had a chance for the Tahs - but didn't he look better when he had a ball player outside him in the RSA last year? His facilitating skills became evident.
But as I said in that earlier post and you have indicated also: 3 into 2 won't go.
Lee Grant said:No - my family went to NZ the year I started high school and I was there for about 7 years
Lee Grant said:waratahjesus
Son - you have to stop reading James Joyce.
cyclopath said:[Hence, still good acceleration, but less top speed. He's shifting 10-15 20-30 more kilos.
waratahjesus said:and the wallabies still need saving, coincidence?
Scarfman said:Beale was 100m sprint champion!? That astonishes me.
Ish is right about Mitchell, Beale, Turner, and Barnes having to play.
I'm going to guess that Mitchell has been promised 15, and Barnes 10, so let's slot Beale at 12 and Turner at wing. That leaves a wing spot for Anesi and the 13 for Carter, Horne or Sidey.
Reserves would be Hangers + one of the 13s. Easy to swap fullbacks and wings around if injured.
Let's call it:
10. Barnes
11. Anesi
12. Beale
13. Carter
14. Tuner
15. Mitchell
22. Halangahu
23. Sidey