Scarfman said:Valentine is a peanut. I have no idea how he stays employed. Slow to clear, ridiculous options.
Scotty said:Re Barnes, to test the 'combination theory' that many learned and more astute judges than I believe should work.
The Barnes and Burgess combination doesn't exactly have the Tahs backline firing, why do you think it will work for the Wallabies?
Personally, as much as he annoys the crap out of me I'd be inclined to pick Valentine ahead of Burgess, who would be on the bench. I would also give plenty of time to the 10 that is on the bench to get a direct comparison with the starting 10.
Backline for the first test of:
9 Valentine
10 Cooper
11 Mitchell
12 Giteau
13 AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)
14 Ioane
15 Hynes
Burgess, Barnes, Horne
Ash said:Some amusing differences, you can see the provincialism in selections. Wonder if this means that it's a close race for some positions, or just some of us are more biased than others?
Examples:
Reds supporter backline: 3 Reds starting, 1 Tah starting
Tahs supporter backling: 5 Tahs startings, 0 Reds starting
Scarfy's experiement would've been even better if he had teams that had a mixed set of supporters, and teams that had supporters of only 1 team.
Scotty said:It was pretty obvious to me that the Reds backline was the best of the Australian backlines this year
Scarfman said:Scotty said:It was pretty obvious to me that the Reds backline was the best of the Australian backlines this year
Maybe. I thought our backs saved the piggies' arses on several occasions in the 2nd half of the year. On form you be seriously looking at Barnes, Mitchell, Beale, whereas 6 weeks ago you wouldn't take any of them.
+ I've got Hynes, Cooper and Ioane in my team so can't be accused of anything.
fatprop said::nta: They are all wounded
fatprop said:Of the Reds backs I thought Genia, Cooper, Digby and Higgenbottom would be selected with smokeys being S Faainga, Weekes and Chambers.
Of them Genia Higgenbottom & Weekes are wounded but I expect the others to be there or thereabouts
Scarfman said:Scotty said:It was pretty obvious to me that the Reds backline was the best of the Australian backlines this year
Maybe. I thought our backs saved the piggies' arses on several occasions in the 2nd half of the year. On form you be seriously looking at Barnes, Mitchell, Beale, whereas 6 weeks ago you wouldn't take any of them.
+ I've got Hynes, Cooper and Ioane in my team so can't be accused of anything.
Scotty said:You didn't think that Hynes had a shot, fp?
Wallabies likely to call on rookies to hook in
GREG GROWDEN
May 25, 2010
THE Wallabies may be forced to play two novice hookers for the opening Test against Fiji in Canberra on June 5 as Tatafu Polota-Nau is in doubt with a shoulder injury.
With Stephen Moore sidelined for several months with a fractured jaw, Polota-Nau was scheduled to take over as Australia's No.1 hooker. However, Polota-Nau's decision to play with a shoulder complaint, which revolves around inflammation of the AC joint, since the Crusaders match in Christchurch on April 10 has taken its toll.
When Polota-Nau returned to Sydney with the Waratahs yesterday, he was troubled by his sore shoulder and the Wallabies' medical staff want to assess him this week before deciding whether he will be available for next month's Tests.
However, there is a strong belief the Wallabies will rest him for the bigger Tests in June against England and Ireland. The most likely to move into the Test 22 are the Reds' Saia Fainga'a and Huia Edmonds, who has performed well when coming off the bench for the Brumbies this season.
Polota-Nau conceded that his shoulder is ''not that good''. ''But I'm still hoping all is well with it and that I will be OK for the Fiji game,'' he said yesterday.
The Wallabies' medical staff will also assess wingers Lachie Turner (ribs) and Drew Mitchell (bruised forearm) this week.
England five-eighth Jonny Wilkinson is also in doubt for the Australian tour and will undergo scans this week after hurting his back during Toulon's European Challenge Cup final loss to Cardiff on Sunday.
England have, meanwhile, resolved their pay dispute that threatened to divide the team during their tour of Australia and New Zealand. The pay row concerned some of the squad receiving at least £10,000 more than other tourists if they made the Test team. An independent third party was appointed and the confidential recommendations have been accepted.