dru
David Wilson (68)
Or the lack of jumping options around Skelton. Fardy, Higgers and Pocock is a more balanced back row.
This. If I didn't know better I'd be asking if Ella ever played rugby.
Or the lack of jumping options around Skelton. Fardy, Higgers and Pocock is a more balanced back row.
I'll leave the rest of my team plans so you can have a play with your own ideas, but I hope the principle is clear.
Beale is the back-up 15. Neither AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) or Mitchell have the necessary attacking flair to inject themselves into the line like Beale and Folau can. And the gameplan Cheika will play requires a running/passing 15. Distressing as this is to 50% of the posters on this site, its a fact. Cheika does not play safety-first rugby - if you wanted that then Foley should have got the national coaching role.
That's probably taking things a bit far. If you take out the 2 controversial selections of Dennis at 6 and KB (Kurtley Beale) on the wing you are arguably left with the wallabies side.This. If I didn't know better I'd be asking if Ella ever played rugby.
Kafer's comments in the post game show last night mirror what I've been harping on about for years. The lack of a national skills program. Our HPU in this country is really little more than a junket for whoever lands the job and does little to nothing of real value. There is no backline skills coaching around basic rugby skills, catching passing and kicking, no scrum and set piece school. No national S&C to oversight players likely to be in the national squad.
So we have a situation where it is reported this morning that JOC (James O'Connor) has now been given a special S&C program to bring him to required fitness - two weeks out from the start of the RC.
We have a situtaion where few genuine starting options in the back three can kick effectively from hand, and the two leading 10s are also less than 100% reliable or even 90%. We have halfbacks whose passing can be very very erratic and one test centurion who has been a professional rugby player for over a decade who still cannot pass any better than I can from both hands.
Contrast this to NZ who set the bench mark who have players who have developed and exceeded their best levels in terms of previous skills. The best two examples I can give are 1) J. Savea - was terrible under the high ball, passing wasn't great and kicking virtually non-existent. He is now a complete winger and perhaps the best in the world at the moment. 2) Nonu - remeber when he came on the scene as little more than a bulldozer at 12. He has a better pass than some of the 10s in Oz and certainly a better kicking game.
I do not accept the premise that NZ players are innately better. What really pisses me off is that the NZ skills coach is Australian.
I hate bureaucracy, I would think that a decent coach would be working to fix individual skills of players, the ARU should be training the coaches@fatpop - if the ARU shouldn't be managing this who should? How can we set consistent benchmarks, pathways and clearly show the line in the sand for player to try to get to to be rewarded if its a fee for all?
It reminds me of a comment I read the other day about the selection of Naiyaravoro - it was along the lines of "it speaks volumes about the standard and quality of Australian Rugby, players and teams when a reserve grade winger at best from the NRL. who cant get a game in the top levels of a domestic competition is selected in the Australian side in less than two seasons. Is the talent pool in union that shallow?
and Milner-Skudder was playing U20s for the Bulldogs this time last year ..... so is the NZ talent pool at issue as well?
...and went back to the ITM after his experience, took his chance and showed his stuff and was rewarded. So his time at the Bulldogs was for development the he willingly went back and proved his worth.
I think this shows how much it take to get to the NZRU benchmark standards.
I couldn't agree more. Frankly it really stinks.
...and went back to the ITM after his experience, took his chance and showed his stuff and was rewarded. So his time at the Bulldogs was for development the he willingly went back and proved his worth.
I think this shows how much it take to get to the NZRU benchmark standards.
Now that's interesting.James O'Connor to work on speed: Michael Cheika
Wallabies coach Michael Cheika hopes James O'Connor emerges from a special fitness program at his fleet-footed best in time to push for a spot in Tests against the All Blacks in August.
O'Connor was left out of Cheika's 40-man squad for the opening two games of the Rugby Championship which starts against South Africa in Brisbane on July 18.
Whether he is part of the squad to face the All Blacks in Sydney for the Wallabies' third Test of the series on August 8 will depend on how he measures up on the training paddock.
The 24-year-old has struggled with injury for the Queensland Reds in his return to Super Rugby this season after more than 12 months playing in England and France.
"We've got a fitness program running for him to get back. In particular, for the things that he's good at," Cheika told Triple M.
"He hasn't had his 100 per cent speed back this season ... his footwork ... the things that have made him a really strong player for Australia previously.
"He needs to get those things back in his arsenal, so that when he he does get into the team he can perform and compete with the other wingers and back three players in the squad."
Presumably he's mastered all the other party drugs.James O'Connor to work on speed
Meh. The players are professionals. What they deserve is unimportant. It's what's best for the Wallabies that matters. Criticism of Cheika's reasoning based on Mumm's actual play are infinitely more relevant. Alternatively, Cheiks might be right. Mumm's experience (and his experience of the conditions) plus his high workrate might turn out to be extremely useful.
From the Hurled:
Now that's interesting.
You use the word might a lot. A player who has contributed more to Australian rugby might be better. As for the conditions, we tour there every year and in relation to RWC, the two that have been in the UK in the past, we have won both. Mumm may have evolved because players do that as there careers progress without doubt but Mumms's previous outings in the Wallaby jersey are nothing great to write home about.
It has been a mixed year in Australian rugby but one of the positives has been tight five play. Players at home have put their hand up.
It is nothing personal to any one person but I stand by my comment that the selection stinks.
Quote "we have spesifically chosen 3 sets of tight fives and go hard on set piece and see who comes on top" -MC
Still doesnt settle why Jones is in there.
Does anyone know who all are on the panel who make the choices or is it just Cheika who has everything to say?
You use the word might a lot. A player who has contributed more to Australian rugby might be better. As for the conditions, we tour there every year and in relation to RWC, the two that have been in the UK in the past, we have won both. Mumm may have evolved because players do that as there careers progress without doubt but Mumms's previous outings in the Wallaby jersey are nothing great to write home about.
It has been a mixed year in Australian rugby but one of the positives has been tight five play. Players at home have put their hand up.
It is nothing personal to any one person but I stand by my comment that the selection stinks.