The ARU also announces the re-signings for pretty much anyone who has ever played for the Wallabies even if they clearly aren't getting a top up contract.
I have mentioned DHP before as a backup 15. He has also played a lot of wing he could be a smoky for a wing/fullback spot. his form is very very good ATM and would be a great backup if we are looking for a wing/fullback considering Jocs and Beatles form.
It's the ARU we're talking about that, they don't value props. Wouldn't surprise me if only 1-2 of them have top ups.
Cheika hasn't picked a squad before, he went with Link's squad. We know who he prefers in the 23/15 but some of the players on the EOYT he might not like.
It doesn't match the stats either. Consistently leads in tackles made and runs, despite only playing 60-odd minutes each test.
He's got shortcomings, but work rate isn't one of them.
.
Schatz, (who really is very meh at test level).
He could, but to date, he hasn't. And I mean in Tests. Higgers is good, but he is really nowhere near Read as a Test #8, despite appearing to have many of the attributes to be so.G'day guys, been a following for a while and this comment has got me asking the question..
What I want to know is what's everyones obsession with Palu?
He barely makes gain line, drops in and out of games, his work rate is piss poor and he isn't a reliable lineout option.
Everyone loves to hate on Higgers for his seagull-ing but I believe he will add more balance to a back row of Pocock and Fardy. I think Higger's wide running would complement Pocock and Fardys tighter games.
Also, if Cheika decides to go with Skelton at lock and decides to play Palu in the same team we are going in with only 2 viable lineout options and at test level this is not okay.
Look at how the Crusaders and Allblacks play Kieran Read, he's out in wide channels running at backs, drawing defenders and offloading. Couldn't Higgers could play the same sort of role?
He could, but to date, he hasn't. And I mean in Tests. Higgers is good, but he is really nowhere near Read as a Test #8, despite appearing to have many of the attributes to be so.
All the recent Wallaby coaches have picked him when fit.
Super Rugby v Top 14 is hardly apples for apples. I think it pays to remember that JOC (James O'Connor) had a very impressive stint with toulon also. view video (plus defence) Particularly when you consider some of the players inside Mitchell feeding him quality ball. Giteau, halfpenny, bastareud, michalek just to name a few.
Nah.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nice in theory, but they don't. McCalman is a worker (not a criticism, an observation), Higginbotham is highly talented, but just has not brought that to Test rugby with any consistency, Vaea has looked good in even shorter stints than Palu of late. I'm a fan of all these players, by the way, but I'm a realist. I get what you're saying, but I reckon it's a bit fanciful to expect a magic back-row, apart from moments of brilliance from Pocock or Hooper (or maybe Fardy). We look for this X-factor, but it doesn't seem to be there.Palu has shouldered the load from an under performing tight 5 for the majority of his career. He does the unseen in-tight work well and does have a high work rate. Thats great but certainly not ideal for an 8 man. He basically plays as an extra lock.
We are now getting a tight 5 together that can carry the load which opens the door for the back row to bring something different to the game.