Just saw the squad. Very surprising decisions but potentially good ones. It look strong on paper with the return of taf, palu, mitchell, horne and barnes, but the question is if those class players can regain test match form. Well I guess we'll wait and see
I want some of whatever Deans is on.
How could he justify picking Elsom as captain from game 1 in 2011. He had the perfect, ready made excuse not to. He could have brought him back from the bench in game 1. Maybe picked him in game 2 or given him more game time. It would have been bleeding obvious that he hadn't done enough to be sure to start and the transition could have been as smooth as a baby's bum. Instead, he lets Elsom play himself into form so that he had his best game this year against the meat eaters and then promptly drops him as captain, thereby signalling that he's no certainty to make the run on team in NZ.
I dont think Elsom was ever the right guy for the job but I also think that this sequence of events sends entirely the wrong message. And that message is one that Deans has no power to control simply because these guys are not all entirely stupid. They will read it for what it is, over time, irrespective of what is said in team talks or how it is spun to the media as the purge we had to have (note: Growden has already swallowed that one). The moderately intelligent in the squad will be given to thinking "WTF were those last 4 tests all about?" - "how come rocky played his best game and was stripped of the captaincy?" - "how come it took us 4 years to get to this point 2 weeks out from the RWC?"
It is not to be forgotten that the last time Deans took a team to a World Cup, in 2003, that team collapsed in a heap on ANZ stadium....true it is that they did so at the feet of a team that went as close to winning the world cup as you can without winning it. And they were coached by a bloke we were all very happy to see the back of.
So, in one sense, he is entering water in which his charts may not be up to date.
It is also more than odd that he picks 3 hookers and 3 half backs. Only 1 pool game will be a contest - for that we need the A team. For every other game it wouldn't matter who we picked and it cant seriously be suggested that performance on the training paddock will determine who gets the nod in the 1/4s.
Of course the shooting match all falls apart when the noted crocks limp home: It has to be a huge risk with Mitchell and Barnes - perhaps the lesser of the 2 being MItchell since at least you can x ray his injury! How long will Palu and Horne last?
Finally Deans has ODd on whatever he is smoking in picking only one 7. If he thinks that the gutless mob of refs assembled for RWC 2011 are going to be tough on "fetchers", as Growden calls them, thus favouring lopers, he has completely forgotten what NZ crowds can do to the will of even the strong willed - let alone refs. McCaw will have a field day, aided and abetted by the local press and the spectators - what are the odds he even gets 1 yellow card?