I've been thinking about the 3 amigos and how most people here fall on one side or the other:
- dislike them because they're trouble making prima donnas who undermine rather than contribute to team morale by virtue of their incessant antics;
- geniuses who should be forgiven every sin because of their potential to pull something out of a hat.
Rather than merely debate these two sides of the argument I thought it would be interesting to see if anyone is able to identify a player with these types of issues, on a long term basis, who ever fulfilled the potential identified when they were first picked.
I struggle to think of one.
My premise is that picking blokes in spite of their behaviour because they have potential, either theoretical or shown from time to time, is a flawed approach. Almost without fail I reckon if you pick the bloke with his head and heart in the right place you will finish up in front.