No, I think there is plenty that needs to be improved and I'd certainly make some different selections.
I just don't connect the fact that the Wallabies have been pretty unsuccessful over the last few years as being a reason to get rid of the more senior players who have played through that era. It's a non sequitur.
By your logic we should ditch guys like Harry Wilson because he has a winning percentage of 33% which is way lower than all those older players.
Let's try and select our best players each season. It makes little sense to think that a player who looks worse at Super Rugby level is going to be a better test player than the experienced test player who outperforms them at Super Rugby level as well.
Not by my logic, BH, but by your interpretation of my logic.
I have not said anywhere that Wilson should be dropped. Moved to 6, yes, where he can contribute more in attack. His ball carrying at 8 has been ineffectual.
If I was advocating dropping all those who participated in a 33% winning percentage, I'd be demanding the whole team be dropped. Look closer, you'll see I am advocating for certain of the longer term players who are part of an ingrained failure culture to be replaced. Same team in 21, same results. That might satisfy some here, but not me.
Anyway, we can look forward to some changes, if not the specific ones I have identified, in the next Wallaby season. I am extremely confident that Dave Rennie will want to improve his results and he will have the benefit of watching a full SRAu and TT before doing so.
Have a safe and happy break.