The English tries were not soft. They are typical of the tries that result from the Wolf Pack defence adopted by England. This is an enhanced version of the blitz defence - sort of a blitz on steroids. Saracens are Europe's best club side and they have been playing this way for years. They score a vast amount of tries from pressurising the attacking team. Paul Gustard has recently moved from Saracens to be England's defence coach. The commitment to the system can be seen by Burrell getting pulled off after just thirty minutes because he was not committing to the system.
Australia scored out wide because that is where virtually all tries are scored against the wolf pack defence.
I expect England to be better in defence after another week to practice the new system. I expect Australia to better too.
I don't think that because England were using a wolf pack defence, it follows that their tries weren't soft. The one from Folau's pass was definitely soft, he was under a bit of pressure from the rush but nothing unusual for a fullback. It was just a shocking pass. After that, it was fortunate bounce more than anything that allowed Joseph to kick ahead to score.
And the try off Haskell's break was from an attacking maul, where the Wallabies left a gap large enough to land a jet in. After that it was simple numbers.
Anyway, if they want to try and employ the same defence on us in Melbourne, I say let them go nuts. Phipps was getting some of the quickest ball I've seen, Foley and our backs were standing deep enough that the rush didn't work, and they were "wolf-packing" in so close to the breakdown that they didn't have enough out wide to deal with Folau and co.