Adam84
Rod McCall (65)
Similar reason as to some outside backs can play wing and not fullback.So why do some loose heads play both sides and some don’t?
Different skillset and physique required, some can do both, some cant.
Similar reason as to some outside backs can play wing and not fullback.So why do some loose heads play both sides and some don’t?
Robertson started as a tight head and was shifted to suit the team. He's now been asked to move back. Same with Kepu I think.So why do some loose heads play both sides and some don’t?
Robertson changed from THP to .loose head to accommodate Kepu for the Tahs. It's been a wile since he played any significant time there. You're right though, he can play there at a pinchRobertson started as a tight head and was shifted to suit the team. He's now been asked to move back. Same with Kepu I think.
Ideally, they could all just specialise. Useful have a bloke who can play the other side in a pinch though.
Kerevi's injury not as bad as first thought. May be out for four weeks, hopefully back in time for Scotland, if not definitely England according to SMH.
Kerevi’s season not over yet, McLennan lauds ‘incredible’ Rennie
Samu Kerevi’s ankle injury isn’t as bad as first thought. Meanwhile, the RA chairman says the Wallabies coach is “everything that we could have hoped for”.www.smh.com.au
Also the nature of scrummaging has changed quite a bit over the years due to law tweaks, at the moment I feel the scrummaging laws support tall powerful looshead props who can physically dominate their opposition, whereas even a few years ago I think it was better suited to shorter stockier looseheads who could set lower under their opposition.
The engagement sequence is the biggest factor here.
On the surface many positives come to mind.Article today on the Fox Sports website talking about centralising rugby here, ala Ireland and NZ.
Exclusive: Rugby Australia on the cusp of the ‘biggest change since rugby went professional’
Exclusive: Rugby Aus on the cusp of ‘biggest change since rugby went professional’www.foxsports.com.au
Hardly "lots".But also lots of negatives.
This seems frought with "danger" for the lesser unions like the Western Force.
They appear to be building up their own head of steam as far as development structures are concerned and why would they even contemplate letting Rugby Australia get their grubby paws over them again after what they went through previously under their "stewardship".
I guess because their players will inevitably want to represent Australia and take RA money.But also lots of negatives.
This seems frought with "danger" for the lesser unions like the Western Force.
They appear to be building up their own head of steam as far as development structures are concerned and why would they even contemplate letting Rugby Australia get their grubby paws over them again after what they went through previously under their "stewardship".
I don’t think they could just put him in another franchise. Wright may prefer to play wing for the Brumbies rather than fullback for the Tahs.Agreed. It might lighten these pages with all the speculation of trying players out of position. If Rennie sees Wright as a 15 and the brumbies want to continue with Banks (as an example) the ARU could put him with another province.
‘My’ goal was to finish the year at #4. Not counting baby chooks just yet but they may well outperform that.So if Australia have an undefeated NH tour and both NZ and SAF lose one then we move to world #1
Far cry from 4 weeks ago …