Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Exactly, my point being that what is deemed acceptable is temporally and culturally relative.Probably because all the homosexuals would have been in jail, alongside the aboriginals who attempted to vote
Exactly, my point being that what is deemed acceptable is temporally and culturally relative.Probably because all the homosexuals would have been in jail, alongside the aboriginals who attempted to vote
OK so let's get this back on track.
RA have signalled their intent to terminate his contract, and now it seems Israel wants to fight this termination.
While many of us have applauded RA's strong stance, they haven't left themselves much room to move on this.
Is there any way Israel can save his career? I'm not too familiar with the RA appeal process, but is there a chance this all turns around if he is contrite and pledges to delete his accounts etc?
.
oh, he's Destiny Church... explains a lot. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.
For those non-Kiwis here who might never have heard of this crowd, let me tell you a few things about Destiny Church that you probably won't find in their brochures....
1. Members must sign an oath of loyalty and obedience to their leader, Brian Tamaki.
2. There is a protocol for interacting with Tamaki - you must always be respectful, you must stop talking when he speaks, you must never disagree with him in front of others and you must stand when he and his wife enter a room and you can only sit when they sit.
3. Tamaki once thought Destiny Church would rule New Zealand
4. Tamaki blames gays, murderers and sinners for the Christchurch Earthquakes of 2010 and 2011
5. Destiny Church is patriarchal, women are considered weak.
6. Destiny Church raises members to be ready for war. Tamaki has repeatedly stated that it wants power. His blackshirts marched on Parliament in 2004 against civil unions. It claimed the government was "evil" with a "radical homosexual agenda".
Tamaki is a power-hungry, manipulative scumbag.
Destiny Church is a Cult, not a church, and its a fraud.
Their "blackshirts" are morons.
Exactly, my point being that what is deemed acceptable is temporally and culturally relative.
OK so let's get this back on track.
RA have signalled their intent to terminate his contract, and now it seems Israel wants to fight this termination.
While many of us have applauded RA's strong stance, they haven't left themselves much room to move on this.
Is there any way Israel can save his career? I'm not too familiar with the RA appeal process, but is there a chance this all turns around if he is contrite and pledges to delete his accounts etc?
.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-17/israel-folau-is-prepared-to-walk-away-from-rugby/9665850"After we'd all talked, I told Raelene if she felt the situation had become untenable — that I was hurting Rugby Australia, its sponsors and the Australian rugby community to such a degree that things couldn't be worked through — I would walk away from my contract, immediately."
I'm not a lawyer but an unfair dismissal case could potentially be successful.
Probably because all the homosexuals would have been in jail, alongside the aboriginals who attempted to vote
Yep.This is pretty similar to Kurtley Beale.
Rugby Australia went into that wanting to terminate his contract and the code of conduct process found that they did not have grounds and he stayed.
Both the instagram and the twitter post are still up, you'd think any contrition would begin with the voluntary removal of them. I'm guessing it comes down to the terms of his contract but it's clear he understands RA's position from the last incident and I don't see any real out for him. In his own words:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-17/israel-folau-is-prepared-to-walk-away-from-rugby/9665850
From another forum:
I think if turned out that he was a member of a cult, that could constitute mitigating circumstances.
This is pretty similar to Kurtley Beale.
Rugby Australia went into that wanting to terminate his contract and the code of conduct process found that they did not have grounds and he stayed.
He would just get his contract paid out, he wouldnt be reinstated.He'd be mad to go down this road, though.
He's been kicked out of the game, a move that has been received positively by the majority of fans. Even the NRL don't want him.
So he thinks he can fight this and just walk back into the game? Don a gold jersey and head to the World Cup? Score tries and soak up standing ovations?
Nope. He's cooked. Yeah he might win a court case, but he's already lost in court of public opinion.
And by 'court of public opinion' I don't just mean a few woke Twitter commentators. All my mates think it was the right call too. People at the office agree with it. Blokes on the street.
Even if he wins his appeal, the Waratahs and Wallabies could surely just stand him down for the rest of the season on full pay.
.
He'd be mad to go down this road, though.
He's been kicked out of the game, a move that has been received positively by the majority of fans. Even the NRL don't want him.
So he thinks he can fight this and just walk back into the game? Don a gold jersey and head to the World Cup? Score tries and soak up standing ovations?
Nope. He's cooked. Yeah he might win a court case, but he's already lost in court of public opinion.
And by 'court of public opinion' I don't just mean a few woke Twitter commentators. All my mates think it was the right call too. People at the office agree with it. Blokes on the street.
Even if he wins his appeal, the Waratahs and Wallabies could surely just stand him down for the rest of the season on full pay.
.
Only if he doesn’t want to go to Europe.He maybe cooked as to being reinstated, but the outcome of whether the termination was valid and legal can also be about extracting more cash as an outcome of a wrongful termination.
I would be amazed if this doesn't turn into SCs at 10 paces