• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

The Israel Folau saga

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Ok the former employee Rod Kafer. Serious difference I suppose, does it really changes the core aspects of the post. Again we have a nit picking of unimportant sidelines.

The reports I have been able to find from several authors all speak of confidential letter to the RA board, yet this is in the hands of reporters. Is this not a leak of the leaking?

Utmost professionalism from RA in that media release. That is laughable as I have outlined.
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
in line with the context of my post, your issue is with social standards and not an individual CEO, there’s no need to discuss him the board he represents or the company he works for.
I’ve never used the term social standards ever. You clearly have me confused with some one else
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
What possible reason would RA have to leak it?

I doubt it would be an "official leak", in the minutes of the last meeting or in the Chair's diary. Many things have been leaked by officials to many journalists for many years. Will be in the future, perhaps depending on the outcomes of last week's AFP investigations and some significant law reforms being flagged. All for many varying reasons, from public interest, personal interest, vengeance, monetary gain..... the list goes on. Its not an organisational motivation but it is an organisational responsibility.
 

formerflanker

Ken Catchpole (46)
From news.com:

In a scathing letter that has been published by The Daily Telegraph, Folau has demanded answers on how intimate details of his Code of Conduct hearing, which was meant to be private, came to fall into the hands of prominent rugby journalist Jamie Pandaram.
......they (RA) have not denied his claims that they leaked sensitive information.
Israel wants an explanation why confidential sworn testimony and witness statements were leaked to the media.
I am sure many rugby followers also want to know. It looks like a PR attack on Israel.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
God this is painful.

I know the vanilla flavour argument that this was simply and only about breach of employment conditions, but honestly this has been an issue brewing for a very long time as societal mores have shifted and “the church” become less respected. It was going to blow up somewhere.

Somewhere that was always going to be tested at the highest level possible on the basis of a belief that religious freedom is sacrosanct. Doesn’t matter whether you agree or not, nor whether you vehemently support the removal of IF on the employment contract terms, the issue was going to blow up somewhere.

For me, it is an extremely important topic that needs testing and I actually have some positive expectation in our legal system doing better than others presume. That system has often stepped in successfully in the movement of social norms and a political cohort that failed occasionally to address things via policy.

What I utterly detest is that the issue is proceeding under a banner of “rugby”.

For the life of me the very serious risk of this happening was writ large in neon from the outset.
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
I doubt it would be an "official leak", in the minutes of the last meeting or in the Chair's diary. Many things have been leaked by officials to many journalists for many years. Will be in the future, perhaps depending on the outcomes of last week's AFP investigations and some significant law reforms being flagged. All for many varying reasons, from public interest, personal interest, vengeance, monetary gain... the list goes on. Its not an organisational motivation but it is an organisational responsibility.
RA/ARU have been leaking all manner of stories to favoured journalists for some time.

Should RA lose the unlawful termination part of the action then the public nature of some of the initial process would most likely count against them in terms of the damages part of the action.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
Everybody, corporations or otherwise, uses press leaks. It has become a legitimate (if occasionally reprehensible) tactic. All's fair in love and war. The ends justify the means. Etc etc.
 

Tex

Greg Davis (50)
What does he expect? He's taken them to the mattresses and complains when the knives come out.
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
What does he expect? He's taken them to the mattresses and complains when the knives come out.
I presume by what’s been said that he’s complaining that a confidential letter he sent them was leaked to the press.

I guess he expected confidential correspondence to be kept in confidence. If so he’s learnt a lesson.
 

Joe Blow

John Hipwell (52)
I presume by what’s been said that he’s complaining that a confidential letter he sent them was leaked to the press.

I guess he expected confidential correspondence to be kept in confidence. If so he’s learnt a lesson.
Let’s face it, he has proven himself to not be a man of his word throughout this process. I doubt that he can expect much from this point on.
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
Let’s face it, he has proven himself to not be a man of his word throughout this process. I doubt that he can expect much from this point on.
I think it’s clear that the gloves are off. But let’s not pretend that RA are lilywhite in this matter.

Apart from the procession of coaches and players who were wheeled out to make comments before the code of conduct hearing, last week we had one of RA’s pet journalists have enough information to write 4 double page spreads in the paper. Much of that could only have come from one of the parties.

RA have had their PR machine in operation from day one so it’s a bit rich for them to complain about Folau engaging one.

As for Kafer’s intervention; get me a bucket
 

Joe Blow

John Hipwell (52)
The best chance Folau and his team have of making any way is to muddy the waters as much as possible. It’s more likely that the leak came from them.
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
The best chance Folau and his team have of making any way is to muddy the waters as much as possible. It’s more likely that the leak came from them.
I can’t see how it would be in Folau’s interest to leak anything that we read in the paper last week. But neither of us know so it’s best to agree or disagree
 

refugee

Sydney Middleton (9)
Proud to say that I make four of the list on Israels post so as hell awaits me I will weigh in.
Israel stupid , RA stupider.
Can't wait for the disclosure documents on the way to the court. Should make interesting reading and will the board stand down if they lose?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top