A mutterer
Chilla Wilson (44)
but was he wrong?Cheika now doing his one eyed review. Should not be on STAN. Not impartial.
enquiring minds want to know .......
but was he wrong?Cheika now doing his one eyed review. Should not be on STAN. Not impartial.
On the other hand, It was clearly a no arms tackle.Cheika now doing his one eyed review. Should not be on STAN. Not impartial.
We're leaving that sort of junk selective referee analysis back in 2021but was he wrong?
enquiring minds want to know .......
Is he wrong?Cheika now doing his one eyed review. Should not be on STAN. Not impartial.
I didn’t want to see that. Can we just say the Reds are not good in the wet.Tahs 85 attacking rucks
Reds 22 attacking rucks
Tahs 20mins in Reds 22
Reds 3 mins in Tahs 22
Tahs 16 points
Reds 20 points
Why open the can without reviewing every incident? It is lazy commentary.Is he wrong?
Reds winning with those stats in the wet? You'd have to say they're very good in the wet, no?I didn’t want to see that. Can we just say the Reds are not good in the wet.
But is he wrong?Why open the can without reviewing every incident? It is lazy commentary.
An absolute fucking NO. WE SUCK IN THE WET.Reds winning with those stats in the wet? You'd have to say they're very good in the wet, no?
Cheika now doing his one eyed review. Should not be on STAN. Not impartial.
His service wasn't great, but it looked more like nerves causing him to put a bit too much on the passes than anything else. Should be much better for the runOn a positive I thought Spencer Jeans held well. Stewart defended well. But that’s about it.