• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

RWC Final - New Zealand v South Africa 29/10/23, 0800 NZDT

Who wins & after how long?

  • New Zealand

    Votes: 19 52.8%
  • South Africa

    Votes: 15 41.7%
  • 80 minutes

    Votes: 18 50.0%
  • Extra Time (2 x 10 minutes)

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Sudden Death Extra Time (max. 10 minutes)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Penalty Kick Shootout (max. five kickers per team)

    Votes: 2 5.6%

  • Total voters
    36

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
Faf should have lost the feed on that scrum, was no chance he was ever feeding the ball. He was killing the clock and Barnes pretty much said I'm not making that call to Ardie. Should have given a free kick and called a spade a spade when it was that clear and obvious.
Well looked to me like the Boks actually didn't hold the weight,going for what they got a reset, but thems the breaks.
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
He was killing the clock and Barnes pretty much said I'm not making that call to Ardie. Should have given a free kick and called a spade a spade when it was that clear and obvious.

From the QF stage onward it was clear the refs were backing right off in the last few minutes, particularly the games where a penalty could decide it.
 

Sword of Justice

Arch Winning (36)
Faf should have lost the feed on that scrum, was no chance he was ever feeding the ball. He was killing the clock and Barnes pretty much said I'm not making that call to Ardie. Should have given a free kick and called a spade a spade when it was that clear and obvious.
Completely disagree, ABs desperate for a TH in the dying minutes laid on the weight immediately and pushed before the ball was fed. I think Barnes would have been closer to a short arm for early shove than for not holding the weight.
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
this for me. the three best teams (Ireland, France and AB's) that can actually play Rugby in all its dimensions, have some attacking flair and can defend as well, get beaten by a limited (but clearly effective) game plan based on brute strength and kicking. and the officiating imo left a bit to be desired.
Its always been thus and one of those facts those who lean more into the League side of things tend to hate.
 

Goosestep

Jim Clark (26)
this for me. the three best teams (Ireland, France and AB's) that can actually play Rugby in all its dimensions, have some attacking flair and can defend as well, get beaten by a limited (but clearly effective) game plan based on brute strength and kicking. and the officiating imo left a bit to be desired.
In most sports, the winner of a finals match will be the team who implements a conservative game plan .

Not always - but it happens a lot .
 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
I might have been half asleep, but did Barnes admit an incorrect penalty but still allow the penalty kick to stand????

I've been thinking about that...

If you asked me to name a ref who, having made an error, would admit to it & try to correct it, I'd say Barnes.

The fact he admitted to the error but let it stand suggests to me that he had to let it stand. I don't think he could even have asked TMO to "check for foul play on 7 Black, or any other reason the penalty should not stand" because TMO would only be able to rule on the foul play element, not the "any other reason" part.

That said, if thete was nothing he could've done id expect him to have said as much to Ardie. Which i didn't hear him do. Can anyone explain what happened in terms of the applicable Law(s)?
 
Last edited:

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
^ doesn't look flash @Penriff_boy but single-shot screen grabs often don't. I'm sure if you went frame-by-frame you'd find plenty of similarly bad-looking contacts in any given game.
I actually noticed that one real-time and just assumed that they had looked at it in the background. Who knows. You'd sure hope so. After Kerevi got done all those years ago against Wales you tend to be a little more keyed in to seeing the old leading forearm in games.
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
I actually noticed that one real-time and just assumed that they had looked at it in the background. Who knows. You'd sure hope so. After Kerevi got done all those years ago against Wales you tend to be a little more keyed in to seeing the old leading forearm in games.
Yeah the one and only time someone has been done for it in the history of forever. :rolleyes:
 

Namerican

Bill Watson (15)
I actually noticed that one real-time and just assumed that they had looked at it in the background. Who knows. You'd sure hope so. After Kerevi got done all those years ago against Wales you tend to be a little more keyed in to seeing the old leading forearm in games.
And Jeb Sinclair (Canada) (red) and Finn Russell (red) and Kerevi again this RWC (yellow).

You've had the same action result in everything from a red, to a yellow, to not even a penalty. And that's with a referee, two ARs and the TMO. It's incomprehensible.

I understand it if the ref misses a subtle knock on or something iffy at the breakdown, but we are talking about potential red cards, which are match deciding. You can't apply the laws willy nilly in that area.
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
Best win ever for the Springboks. Looking at the tournament as a whole I think that France win was very important. Sad to lose Nienaber to Leinster and Jones to England. Luckily Rassie stay and will take us into the new era. Kolisi and this squad will be remembered as Springbok legends and will tour SA after arrival on monday.

Hard luck to the All Blacks, they came very close. Respect in the way they handle the loss and not like the English back in 2019.

Wayne Barnes was excellent, made a few mistakes but its human.

Next series is against Ireland.
 
Top