• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

RWC 2019 SF1: New Zealand v England

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
I'll post this message in the Cheika thread but it's also relevant here.

In his post-match press conference Steve Hansen got pissy with a reporter after the All Blacks' hunger was questioned, and literally asked the reporter to step outside with him.

Now, maybe he meant for a quiet conversation about the ins and outs of motivation, but generally an invitation to "step outside" = to settle a dispute physically.

Cheika may have had vinegar for piss in many of his press conferences, but to my memory he never went as far as to threaten fisticuffs.

I never actually thought he meant step outside for a punch up, but I suppose if you take things that way I guess you could take it to mean that, just shows how we spend our lives:)
 

Tex

Greg Davis (50)
I can't think of any other reason to invite someone to step outside.

Anyway, I'm personally not particularly stressed about what he said, more bemused by the hand wringing and moaning every time Cheika gets irritable at a press conference. Makes me suspect people with grind stones are looking for axes.
 
B

Bobby Sands

Guest
I can't think of any other reason to invite someone to step outside.

Anyway, I'm personally not particularly stressed about what he said, more bemused by the hand wringing and moaning every time Cheika gets irritable at a press conference. Makes me suspect people with grind stones are looking for axes.

I agree, step outside means one thing. Given it was a press conference if he wanted to explain himself further in a non-physical way he had the perfect forum.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Don’t think this helps the haka at all. Only likely to raise ire from the few who don’t like it.
 

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member
I wonder if you would get fined if you crossed the halfway near the sideline. There is room here for some experiments.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
My take on this game?

The Poms played the best, most dominant, most complete game of rugby against seriously top class opposition I have seen in years

It will be interesting if they can get to the same level two weeks in a row
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
England fined for six of their players crossing halfway during the haka (which no-one here in NZ seems to have a problem with), same happened to France in '11 so at least they're being consistently petty.

https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/r...l-blacks-haka-ahead-rugby-world-cup-semifinal

World Rugby continuing to struggle to find the pulse of the rugby public.
I reckon most real rugby fans are equally happy to see the haka and other challenges performed, as they are to see teams respond to the challenge. This sort of thing will only increase the babbling from the mouth-breathers about banning it.
 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
Dane Coles re: the haka brouhaha:

"I thought it was awesome, that's what the haka is about, it's a challenge. They walked forward. I know all the boys were pumped for it we were looking around like 'let's go'.

"From an All Blacks perspective we didn't think it was bad. We thought it was awesome."

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12280977

Pretty much what everyone I've spoken to or heard talking about it with others have said.
 

formerflanker

Ken Catchpole (46)
Dane Coles re: the haka brouhaha:

"I thought it was awesome, that's what the haka is about, it's a challenge. They walked forward. I know all the boys were pumped for it we were looking around like 'let's go'.

"From an All Blacks perspective we didn't think it was bad. We thought it was awesome."

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12280977

Pretty much what everyone I've spoken to or heard talking about it with others have said.

Fans love the drama.
However, the issue is that NZ rugby and World Rugby have given the haka an unlimited licence, while opposing teams have many restrictions placed on them.
From NZs increasing professionalism and aggressive performance of the haka through to World Rugby's overly protective rules and regulations, there is no even playing field.
The argument that the haka has cultural significance does not give NZ carte blanche to do it however they want. The current theatre of haka performance is a recent innovation and so aggressive challenges could be introduced too.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
Fans love the drama.
However, the issue is that NZ rugby and World Rugby have given the haka an unlimited licence, while opposing teams have many restrictions placed on them.
From NZs increasing professionalism and aggressive performance of the haka through to World Rugby's overly protective rules and regulations, there is no even playing field.
The argument that the haka has cultural significance does not give NZ carte blanche to do it however they want. The current theatre of haka performance is a recent innovation and so aggressive challenges could be introduced too.


:rolleyes:
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
My take on this game?

The Poms played the best, most dominant, most complete game of rugby against seriously top class opposition I have seen in years

It will be interesting if they can get to the same level two weeks in a row



I think it is as much about attitude and self-belief as anything else. They have it in spades, and will not lose it in a hurry.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
As for the haka, I like to see it performed, but why not at the end of the game? At the moment it is a bit more like a stage show than a genuine expression of a traditional errrr welcome or expression of respect or whatever it is meant to be (no disrespect intended)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tex

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
As for the haka, I like to see it performed, but why not at the end of the game? At the moment it is a bit more like a stage show than a genuine expression of a traditional errrr welcome or expression of respect or whatever it is meant to be (no disrespect intended)

Funny thing is Wam, it a bit strange to lay down a challenge after the game, mind you could do it then and also the anthems I suppose!
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Funny thing is Wam, it a bit strange to lay down a challenge after the game, mind you could do it then and also the anthems I suppose!

No. After would be a nonsense. Challenge (and response) up front.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
Funny thing is Wam, it a bit strange to lay down a challenge after the game, mind you could do it then and also the anthems I suppose!



I have been labouring under the impression that the haka was not just a challenge. I have seen it performed at a wedding. And it is performed on all sorts of occasions, apparently as a gesture of respect. Or mourning. Or just about anything, from what my Anglo-Saxon brain can understand.



So I repeat my view. It seems to me that it could just as easily, and appropriately, be performed at the end of the game. In fact, that might be more appropriate in terms of ours being a sport, and not actual warfare.
 
Top