drewprint
Alan Cameron (40)
I didn't watch the game (relied on twitter, this forum and a few moments of a choppy live stream at the death), but one of the things that's being raged about is the lopsided penalty count. Being a staunch Reds fan I'm obviously aggrieved that it was so far against my side, BUT if there's one thing I can't stand it's when people demand a balanced penalty count when their team have obviously been infringing far more often. Refs shouldn't have to keep it even for the sake of balance; if one team are idiots then they should suffer the consequences. So, on that note, tell me; did the Reds deserve to be stung with such a skewed penalty count?