• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Rebels 2023

oztimmay

Tony Shaw (54)
Staff member
Not sure how many christmas cards the Rebels will be getting from the other Super sides

Not sure the Rebels care that much either...

Raises a fair question - why is there so much talk of players/officials leaving QLD? What is going on up there?

Must admit I picked Hamish to remain a lifer in the Reds jersey, but I'll happily take him down here.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
Think we will see a bit of Leota at 8 this season with Kemeny at 6. Played a few games at the back end of the season at 8
Thought wilkin played some games at 6. Either way can't see Hardwick as 8 option personally as to me more your 7 option (whether that starting or on the bench with wilkin the form player).
 

7137

Alex Ross (28)
So I guess that means count out Stewart coming to the rebels next year.
I don’t recall seeing the Reds announcing a resign. His 3 year contract he signed in 2019 is up. Perhaps he had conversations. But doubt the Reds have him locked in.
 

GoMelbRebels

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
I don’t recall seeing the Reds announcing a resign. His 3 year contract he signed in 2019 is up. Perhaps he had conversations. But doubt the Reds have him locked in.
They just realised his contract was up. They were meaning to check his file for some time but things got a bit busy, as they do and they forgot all about it.
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
I don’t recall seeing the Reds announcing a resign. His 3 year contract he signed in 2019 is up. Perhaps he had conversations. But doubt the Reds have him locked in.

Yes I mentioned this on the Reds thread - Stewart only confirmed signed until 2022. The Reds media release seems like a play to take control of the situation or at least make it seem like they'll get something in return for him.
 

Tex

Greg Davis (50)
who cares i'm just hoping we can screw the Force again ;)

(still too soon ?)
Counting down until the old chestnut 'EAST COAST ELITIST!!!' gets tossed in here.

Queensland's press release re. the Stewart rumour is pretty funny. Maybe they'll teach Hamish a lesson for the importunity of testing the market by banishing him to club 2nd XV while paying a full professional salary, then trading him to Melbourne regardless and paying 75% of his wage.
 

swingpass

Peter Sullivan (51)
as an aside, but related to transfers, i do think that clubs should get some compensation for transferring players they may have largely developed. it should only apply to the players first club, perhaps even only if they have come through the academy system ? along the lines of a fee to the club after 5 years of service if the club wants an off contract player to stay but the player doesn't, after 10 years no transfer fee. i'm sure you will all be able to pick holes in the flawed logic.
 

Tex

Greg Davis (50)
Might be something to consider.

The QLD and NSW people are fairly parochial when it comes to the harsh realities of a player market. They seem to accept on one hand that rugby in Australia is a professional sport while on the other hand they gnash their teeth any time one of "their" players decides to exercise agency and move to Perth or Melbourne. I'm not ignorant as to why they feel this way, but it is such an opaque conservative throwback mindset.
 

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
Might be something to consider.

The QLD and NSW people are fairly parochial when it comes to the harsh realities of a player market. They seem to accept on one hand that rugby in Australia is a professional sport while on the other hand they gnash their teeth any time one of "their" players decides to exercise agency and move to Perth or Melbourne. I'm not ignorant as to why they feel this way, but it is such an opaque conservative throwback mindset.

i don’t mind players moving about, but if Rebels are approaching players who are signed already and encouraging them to break contract. Then that’s an issue.
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
Might be something to consider.

The QLD and NSW people are fairly parochial when it comes to the harsh realities of a player market. They seem to accept on one hand that rugby in Australia is a professional sport while on the other hand they gnash their teeth any time one of "their" players decides to exercise agency and move to Perth or Melbourne. I'm not ignorant as to why they feel this way, but it is such an opaque conservative throwback mindset.

World Rugby already has grounds for it.

4.7.9 Compensation for a Player’s training and development shall be paid by the Rugby Body or Club (as the case may be) to which the Player is proposing to move, to the Player’s Home Union.
 
Top