It says something the Rebels prefer to try to keep Beale (maybe against the odds) than JOC (James O'Connor) who is not wanted elsewhere. Could be a few reasons - for example, maybe behind the scenes JOC (James O'Connor) is actually more trouble for team culture than Beale, or that the Rebels can only keep one, they need a 10 more than a 12 or wing or fullback, and Beale is seen as having the best potential at 10.
Would love to hear some inside information from the Rebels.
The shame for me is that the Rebels missed out on Foley at 10 thanks to ARU intervention. Gaining Foley would have meant that the loss of both Beale and JOC (James O'Connor) would not have left a massive hole at 10.
Mark me as another who would prefer not to have JOC (James O'Connor) at the Reds, I prefer Taps, even A. Finger currently (both are probably better foils to Cooper anyway). I'll miss Digby, but really with how much it emerged that he's a huge problem behind closed doors, I'm not that sad to see him go. Think it is a similar thing with JOC (James O'Connor) and the Rebels.