TheBigDog
Nev Cottrell (35)
What is it about Wests that would make you assume that their fees would be lower than GPS (and/or on par with Uni's)?
Or to turn that question around if it's easier to answer, why are GPS fees higher than what you assumed Wests would be charging?
EDIT: my post was written before RugbyGreg's post. But I'm interested in how you perceive rego fees are set
Well to be honest I don't have much knowledge of other clubs setups so this is all just what I perceive from an outsiders view.
Look at the current Wests setup for example, two fields, club house facilities and basic changing sheds (also not having a dig here at the Doggies just stating what they have).
Compare it to GPS who have three fields, a larger clubhouse area, brand new sheds being built and upgrades to the stand etc. It would make sense to me that the club with more facilities to maintain would have higher player costs. The extra lighting on the third field alone would be expensive. Also, in accordance with the upgrades being built the fees have risen from $400 in 2012 to $450 in 13/14 (not including early bird discounts).