terry from Townsville
Allen Oxlade (6)
what is foolish is misrepresentation and getting facts wrong .typing in upper case too. try getting facts right and context right before you post.
^ and I'll bet he has been causing all sorts problems for opposing teams at the breakdown with his mobility.
Saw him play a handful of games last year , plays like a genuine 7 should , no doubt his ability to be a constant "on ball" threat has more to you with his footy brain/ intuition and competiveness rather than size.
That is the reason. Better talent and potential in these two players.Maybe a couple of players called Mcreight and Kibble (Reds 20s) (who are both eligible for U20s next year) have had something to do with it rather than the "SIZE" excuse. Both are highly talented and have already been included in this years Under 20s Wallabies training squad. Should be interesting at the breakdown.
Moretti has a contract with the Roosters for next year and made the Australian Schoolboys RL team as well as RU.
Both schoolboy teams have tours at the end of the year, guessing RU lost out to RL with Moretti.
A few years ago now players were asked to align with a code before being chosen on a major tour, then of course there was Craig Polla-Mounter who swore allegiance to RU then promptly did a backflip once the Schoolboy's tour was over. So guess not point trying to tie them down ?
I call bs on the above comment. That's just such a narrow minded view.
That is the reason. Better talent and potential in these two players.
Come on. You do need size in your forwards. That is foolish to say otherwise. Your backs not so much. Size, strength, hit rate with tackles and ball running skills are are necessity in you forwards when competing against the likes of NZ. EVERY BACK NEEDS TO KNOW HOW TO TACKLE AND DEFEND.
I must say that I was expecting more from the NZ Schoolboys side last Saturday at Ballymore. I know NZ got the W but the point difference was minimal in considering the wet game. The skill level other the the NZ 15 was not too different to the Aus team. The forwards were bigger and taller. The scrum was no contest. I would have liked to see the match played on a dry ground. I only watched it on the reply and noticed that the Aus team were fitter and the backs got back into position quicker. Just my opinion.It maybe the case but all I will say if you currently look at Australia's record as compared to the Kiwi's when identifying talent I think I know who I would be taking more notice of. Also I doubt the Kiwi's would have seen much or anything of Herbert before he went over there and has obviously made a big impression in a very short period to time especially in a place that knows how to turn out flankers.
I must say that I was expecting more from the NZ Schoolboys side last Saturday at Ballymore. I know NZ got the W but the point difference was minimal in considering the wet game. The skill level other the the NZ 15 was not too different to the Aus team. The forwards were bigger and taller. The scrum was no contest. I would have liked to see the match played on a dry ground. I only watched it on the reply and noticed that the Aus team were fitter and the backs got back into position quicker. Just my opinion.