• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Proposed Nations Championship

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
No, the test calendar is full during the regulation 9 test window in the years with the new World League.
Tier 2 nations, with players in European clubs aren't been released to play warmups outside of the Regulation 9 window.
Yep fair enough if test window regulations aren't relaxed. Anyway, I understand a few of you are happy to find reasons not to have it, I think it is a good start. And for the first 2 comp cycles maybe the tier 2 nations will have to look at games againt tier 1 in alternate years?
 

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
Yep fair enough if test window regulations aren't relaxed. Anyway, I understand a few of you are happy to find reasons not to have it, I think it is a good start. And for the first 2 comp cycles maybe the tier 2 nations will have to look at games againt tier 1 in alternate years?
the test windows aren't getting 'relaxed', NH clubs won't agree to it without significant financial compensation.
Alternate years are the RWC and B&I Lions tours. For obvious reasons test match opportunities are already limited in those years.

Nothing to do with finding reasons not to have it, just need to understand the impact of SANZAAR and 6Nations making these decisions, there's certainly positives for those unions(hint: it's $$$$), but this is a negative for the Tier 2 nations seeking to close the gap. If you're happy with that, then good for you. I'm worried that this means Tonga and Samoa will be lost to rugby league.

I firmly believe WR (World Rugby) could have better aligned the global calendar in a way which also guaranteed more crossover matches between Tier 1 & 2.
 

WorkingClassRugger

Michael Lynagh (62)
Yep mate, but 2 years in a 4 year cycle , until promotion rlegation is brought in.

Do you really believe promotion/relegation will actually occur? Because I'm very, very skeptical. I see no reason for it not to be a 16 team structure with promotion/relegation from 2026 particularly if it doesn't include the 6Ns and RC as part of it. And even then there would be ways of managing it.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Do you really believe promotion/relegation will actually occur? Because I'm very, very skeptical. I see no reason for it not to be a 16 team structure with promotion/relegation from 2026 particularly if it doesn't include the 6Ns and RC as part of it. And even then there would be ways of managing it.

Emotionally I agree and support your thinking.

Influence-wise, I feel like we are lucky to have an invitation. Is it our remit to rock the boat? WR (World Rugby) has a role here, it isn't an RA role.
 

hifflepiff

Charlie Fox (21)
I'm suprised WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) doesn't ask all tier one teams to play a minimum number of tests against tier two nations.
Even 5 games a year mandated, and subsidised partially by WR (World Rugby) to cover any potential losses would be huge.
 

WorkingClassRugger

Michael Lynagh (62)
Emotionally I agree and support your thinking.

Influence-wise, I feel like we are lucky to have an invitation. Is it our remit to rock the boat? WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) has a role here, it isn't an Rugby Australia role.

Why would we be lucky to be invited? We're a traditional Rugby nation that has long occupied T1 status.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
the test windows aren't getting 'relaxed', NH clubs won't agree to it without significant financial compensation.
Alternate years are the RWC and B&I Lions tours. For obvious reasons test match opportunities are already limited in those years.

Nothing to do with finding reasons not to have it, just need to understand the impact of SANZAAR and 6Nations making these decisions, there's certainly positives for those unions(hint: it's $$$$), but this is a negative for the Tier 2 nations seeking to close the gap. If you're happy with that, then good for you. I'm worried that this means Tonga and Samoa will be lost to rugby league.

I firmly believe WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) could have better aligned the global calendar in a way which also guaranteed more crossover matches between Tier 1 & 2.
Funnily enough the Lions tour years is when second tier nations get best chance of playing tier 1 nations as their top player from Home unuions are generally with Lions, so they tend to seek slightly lesser competition, and WC years they get to play tier 1 in WC. So I say it's still I believe evry 2 years they get their best chances anyway.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
Do you really believe promotion/relegation will actually occur? Because I'm very, very skeptical. I see no reason for it not to be a 16 team structure with promotion/relegation from 2026 particularly if it doesn't include the 6Ns and RC as part of it. And even then there would be ways of managing it.
Have no idea if promotion/relegation will actually occur. But you know what? If I didn't believe the release that says that is the intention, why would I even be bothering to comment on it? I think the WR (World Rugby) will try and and make it a thing, as it makes for better comp I think.

I will add I like the idea of games for tier 2 against tier 1, but realsitically where do we play the games? Do we extend the test season or do we simply say you have to add tests midweek etc. I know the ABs played Tonga here in NZ a couple of years back, the game was panned here and a lot of rugby forums, as Tongan couldn't get all their players back etc.
 
Last edited:

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
I'd be requesting 2-3 games per tier one team per season.
Even 1 game per year is better than this outcome, and I think that’s at least what should have been pushed for.

Still push ahead with the new World League, however rather than a 6 game North vs South system, make it a 5 game tournament and make the 6th match a Tier 1 Vs Tier 2 crossover.

it still allows commercialisation of the product, revenue would still jump significantly for all unions and it ensures there are at least 12 x Tier 1 vs Tier 2 matches in those years.
 

Jimmy_Crouch

Peter Johnson (47)
Have no idea if promotion/relegation will actually occur. But you know what? If I didn't believe the release that says that is the intention, why would I even be bothering to comment on it? I think the WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) will try and and make it a thing, as it makes for better comp I think.

I will add I like the idea of games for tier 2 against tier 1, but realsitically where do we play the games? Do we extend the test season or do we simply say you have to add tests midweek etc. I know the ABs played Tonga here in NZ a couple of years back, the game was panned here and a lot of rugby forums, as Tongan couldn't get all their players back etc.
Ideally, I'd utalise them as warm up tests. So either first test prior to the inbound tours in July, first test before TRC or first test on our European tour.
 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
6N has been trimmed by a week & the November window extended to four weeks. So in addition to three NC macthes Wobs, AB etc will be able (directed by WR (World Rugby) to do so?) to schedule a match v T2 opposition in November & the T2 side will have access to their UK/ Euro-based players. I can see e.g. the Wobs putting out what might be termed an A+ selection i.e. mostly Aus A but with a number of Test players in the 23. Not sure if RA would hand out Test caps but I doubt the T2 hosts would care: remembering that NZR have sent NZ XV's up to Japan but JRU have promoted it as being Japan v All Blacks.
 

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
6N has been trimmed by a week & the November window extended to four weeks. So in addition to three NC macthes Wobs, AB etc will be able (directed by WR (World Rugby) (World Rugby) to do so?) to schedule a match v T2 opposition in November & the T2 side will have access to their UK/ Euro-based players. I can see e.g. the Wobs putting out what might be termed an A+ selection i.e. mostly Aus A but with a number of Test players in the 23. Not sure if Rugby Australia would hand out Test caps but I doubt the T2 hosts would care: remembering that NZR have sent NZ XV's up to Japan but JRU have promoted it as being Japan v All Blacks.
I don’t think this has been approved yet?

Important to note though, there will also be a final for the World League, that will need to take place in the 4th week of the test window, and potentially not decided until the 3rd week of November.

Which makes it difficult to book in test matches for those teams still in contention at that time of year. We could see scenarios scenarios like Wallabies vs Samoa playing at Cardiff, with only 1 week to sell tickets in that case.

Unless they make it like a Magic Round/Super Round event and have multiple teams playing at the one stadium over the 4th weekend. Which would be kind of cool given the alternatives.
 
Last edited:

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
^ if the T1 is putting out an "A+" side there's no reason they couldn't play the T2 midweek or the Sunday after a NC match - just send some of the guys not in your NC 23 who don't need to be kept around in case they're suddenly needed to bolster the "A" lineup.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
More info wrt selection of the two "invitational" teams & promotion/ relegation:

Good reading that WOB, especially the point he talks about promotion relegation would not affect 6Ns or RC, if a team from outside makes it perhaps just an extra test, down SH would make no difference.
 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
^ I suspect a closed-shop 6N was the price of getting Italy on board. Not sure how they're gunna work e.g. Georgia into NC if they're not also part of 6N but they've got four or five years to figure it out :)

As far as TRC goes I really want to see it expanded to six with promotion/ relegation from the earliest possible date.
 
Top