Wilson
Phil Kearns (64)
Looks like it's happening:
Proposed Nations Championship
- Thread starter waiopehu oldboy
- Start date
Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
How long before we have a cup winners cup. Well, not 'we' but teams that win stuff.
Mr Pilfer
Alex Ross (28)
The initial reaction is the likes of Samoa, Georgia, etc are getting shafted but does that necessarily need to be the case
My understanding is that this nations cup with be 11 games (play everyone once). Last year (2022) the Wallabies played 14 tests
I assume we will want at least one more test against the All Blacks but that still leaves 2 more tests we could play against Samoa, Tonga etc???
Looks like England, wales etc played 12 games in 2022 so room for 1 more for them, so they could fit in games vs Portugal, Georgia etc. They could play them as warm up games before the nations cup games
My understanding is that this nations cup with be 11 games (play everyone once). Last year (2022) the Wallabies played 14 tests
I assume we will want at least one more test against the All Blacks but that still leaves 2 more tests we could play against Samoa, Tonga etc???
Looks like England, wales etc played 12 games in 2022 so room for 1 more for them, so they could fit in games vs Portugal, Georgia etc. They could play them as warm up games before the nations cup games
RebelYell
Arch Winning (36)
We could, they could, but we won't and they won't
Ignoto
Peter Sullivan (51)
They could but we've seen the NH countries are all talk when it comes to growing the game.
If relegation is true I expect well see Italy and Georgia replace each other.
Also this.
“The proposed Challenger Series, for 12 teams below those playing in the new international tournament, to also be played in the June/November windows, is hugely important for the development of several of our Pacific and South American stakeholders. SANZAAR is committed to assisting this initiative wherever possible, including the provision of promotion and relegation play-offs to the top nations tournament from 2030.”
“The proposed Challenger Series, for 12 teams below those playing in the new international tournament, to also be played in the June/November windows, is hugely important for the development of several of our Pacific and South American stakeholders. SANZAAR is committed to assisting this initiative wherever possible, including the provision of promotion and relegation play-offs to the top nations tournament from 2030.”
they’ll need to play someone during the Lions tour years.
Members Section
John Thornett (49)
so does the the rwc now just have the 24 nations in these tournaments? or is there still qualifying.
I would imagine it would be very difficult going forward for nations outside the top 24 to get in going forward
I would imagine it would be very difficult going forward for nations outside the top 24 to get in going forward
release also says
- A significant uplift in the number of cross-over matches between unions in the respective divisions are included in the global calendar in the two other years, providing performance nations with annual competition certainty against high performance unions.
Complete review post the RWC. Why do you imagine it will be more difficult for teams out side the top 24 to get in than teams outside the top 20 to get in now?
Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Too many teams frankly. 14 Bledisloes a season, surely.
Dan54
David Wilson (68)
I pretty hohum on this new comp, but can kind of see the point as everyone wants more money, and isn't that point of professional rugby?
I also not sure how Georgia, Samoa etc are getting shafted, or how it could be avoided, there are over 100 nations affiliated to WR (World Rugby), do we think all should be part, or should be playing against tier 1 nations? See someone will always draw a line in the sand and say such and such countries are being shafted or missing out. Uruguay, Chile,Brazil etc etc will all feel the same
I also not sure how Georgia, Samoa etc are getting shafted, or how it could be avoided, there are over 100 nations affiliated to WR (World Rugby), do we think all should be part, or should be playing against tier 1 nations? See someone will always draw a line in the sand and say such and such countries are being shafted or missing out. Uruguay, Chile,Brazil etc etc will all feel the same
hoggy
Nev Cottrell (35)
Yes, Money is the whole point of Professional Rugby. Sadly now it also seems to be the only point about Test rugby as well.
Adam84
Rod McCall (65)
Reality it is this isn’t much change from the current situation, it’s just packaged it up in a bundle they can better on-sell to broadcasters and sponsors. Outside of the COVID Restricted travel years which changed the norm calendar, Tier 1 vs Tier 2 have been infrequent.
on a positive note this provides some actual structure and regular games for teams like Samoa and Tonga who don’t play much between RWCs, albeit it will be against other Tier 2 teams.
on a positive note this provides some actual structure and regular games for teams like Samoa and Tonga who don’t play much between RWCs, albeit it will be against other Tier 2 teams.
LeCheese
Greg Davis (50)
Isn't that the present state of the game though? Aside from the occasional game against 'fringe' teams (Fiji(?), Tonga, Samoa, Japan, Georgia, Portugal, etc.) the 10 'established' T1 teams only really play each other
LeCheese
Greg Davis (50)
Ultimately though, there's a very high likelihood of blowouts in most T1 v T2 matchups, which doesn't benefit fans, the teams involved, or rugby in general.
As Adam said, the biggest positive of this is the challenger series providing more structure and opportunity for T2 nations - hopefully improving their competitiveness - narrowing the gap between T1 and T2 in the future