Thanks Kiap.
I had no idea this was happening otherwise I would have fronted.<snip>
.
Also, the fact that the Fijian, Tongan and Samoan A teams are at the same level as our super rugby A teams shows you could easily have a PI super rugby team. Base it in Auckland with some matches in Western Sydney. They'd be everyone's favourite team to watch and would add a lot of value to the competition.
Unlikely to add much value, if anything basing it in Auckland and playing matches in Sydney is only going to compete with corporate support and fans in two already competitive markets.
Everyone can agree that pacific island flair is exhilarating to watch, but the financials behind a pacific island team simply don't add up. Two major factors which need to be considered when arguing for a new team; how big is the market which the team represents(broadcast value) and how much corporate support is likely to be generated in the region. In both those cases, a pacific island teams doesn't present a very competitive offer.
Thanks Kiap.
I had no idea this was happening otherwise I would have fronted.
Thanks for the blog and giving the result. It's no disgrace that Qld was beaten—I saw the Pampas XV play twice and they are very good team.
For those who don't know the Pampas XV team is made up of players who do not play in Europe, though some of them have done so in the past.
They could give a good account of themselves against certain Super Rugby teams if they are out of sorts.
.
Just to add on to your point about Argentina and bringing their top players to Super Rugby, I recall reading a very good article by Iain Payten about Agustin Pichot (the legendary Argentina scrumhalf who worked to make the Argentinian team a reality).Hopefully any doubts Argentina will be able to field a competitive super rugby team will be put to bed now. Sure, they won't be able to attract their very best players back from Europe, but add to this squad a completely professional set up plus some of their existing pros and they'll surely have a pretty strong side.
And there was talk of Argentina going down the Australia / NZ eligibility route of only picking locally based players for test matches. If they do that I think they could field 2 decent teams in super rugby.
Also, the fact that the Fijian, Tongan and Samoan A teams are at the same level as our super rugby A teams shows you could easily have a PI super rugby team. Base it in Auckland with some matches in Western Sydney. They'd be everyone's favourite team to watch and would add a lot of value to the competition.
Absolutely right. The Aus rugby promotion was almost invisible and the minimal news/web items here have been put to shame by the Argentinian coverage from 12,000 km away.I can´t agree more with you! I do not understand - IRB puts a lot of money in this tournament, the ARU agrees to be the sole host of the tournament and there has been almost no promotion! You cant even get the news in newspapers!
Just to add on to your point about Argentina and bringing their top players to Super Rugby, I recall reading a very good article by Iain Payten about Agustin Pichot (the legendary Argentina scrumhalf who worked to make the Argentinian team a reality).
One of the points was that as a result of the lengthened Pumas season since their inclusion to the Rugby Championship, the massive wages for the French contracts that they were commanding before, were seeing significant cuts. And he [Agustin] said that the majority of the players were on board with the Super Rugby team. Some of their very best players in the NH, guys like Albacete, Lobbe, Hernandez, Leguizamon etc, are 30+ and unlikely to switch to Super Rugby while signed with lucrative contracts, but no doubt you could try to attract the younger players like the U20 players.
The article I was referring to is behind a paywall, but here it is:http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport...into-super-rugby/story-fnii0ksb-1226843699776
And a shorter article here: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ior-to-expansion/story-fni2fxyf-1226848334808