The U15 Reds didn't look that strong when I saw them play a few weeks ago. They won, but only just and against a side full of reserve players.They had a lot of their best players on the bench for most of the game and one who didn't play at all.
My observation on the NSW team was that there was an overemphasis on selecting backrowers based on their ball running ability. Many of the backrowers displayed very strong ball running capabilities at Camden and hence stood out to the casual observer. However picking all them in 1 team, when many of those players have obvious deficiencies at set pieces isn't viable at this next level. eg. In game 1, the starting no.8 clearly didn't know how to pack into a scrum. He simply leaned on the back of the scrum like a league scrum.The selectors really need to pay attention to that age group over the next 12 months to make sure they get the team right, and just as importantly they need to actively engage with some of the league players to make sure they want to play for the Waratahs. I know one young fella, an absolute super star in the making, felt it wasn't worth playing. A big call, but he would have been best on field if he played.
The other interesting observation re the backs is the idea of do you select talented players regardless or position or at this level do you need to start to consider position specific selections. At one stage, the NSW team had 3 players (all who are very very good) on the field who all play 10 for club / rep (playing 10,12,15) and another 3 (again, who are all very good) who all play 15 for club / rep (playing 11,13,14).