Here for the advice
Peter Burge (5)
Add the Scots 15. Some big names went missing. Fitness issues for sure for one or two.
NSW AAGPS 2024
- Thread starter Joker
- Start date
- Status
wisemaan
Sydney Middleton (9)
You never know. Joey's could get unlucky, anything could happen. Everyone is still in the mix...
- wisemaan
thestatisticianofaagps
Frank Row (1)
3s competition very competitive this year. Game of the round was Shore v Joeys today - dominant performance from Shore 3s until late in second half when discipline and some mistakes let Joeys in. Anyone get a good look at stand out players in that game? 13 From Joeys very strong ball runner in previous games from my knowledge.
NedKelly
Herbert Moran (7)
Hi Chairman, thanks for the tables. If you click on top of the columns and select 'sort descending' it will put them in order from highest to lowest.
Attachments
I can hear the emails flooding in.
Squareblade
Frank Row (1)
Kings Prep 12A's beat Shore Prep 7-0. Of interest?
The Chairman
Phil Hardcastle (33)
Ive been wondering if I should do this or just stick to the schools. Ill decide next week
The Chairman
Phil Hardcastle (33)
They rely too much on stars and don’t use the rest of the team. Once Shore shut down Large, they seemed directionless and just ran it without a plan.
NedKelly
Herbert Moran (7)
No worries, entirely as you wish of course. Just tends to set off my OCD! <eye twitches involuntarily>
PROPaganda
Chris McKivat (8)
PROPaganda
Chris McKivat (8)
AAGPS 1st XV Ladder
| SCHOOL | PLD | WON | LOST | DRAWN | FOR | AGN | DIFF | PTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Joseph's College | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 110 | 71 | 39 | 8 | WWLWW | |
| Newington College | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 111 | 112 | -1 | 6 | WWWLL | |
| The King's School | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 108 | 112 | -4 | 5 | LWWLD | |
| Shore | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 108 | 106 | 2 | 4 | WLLWL | |
| Saint Ignatius' College | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 76 | 78 | -2 | 4 | LLLWW | |
| The Scots College | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 73 | 107 | -34 | 3 | LLWLD |
The Front Rower
Ward Prentice (10)
TSC are so poorly coached. Unfortunately the coaching of lack of game plan is not great. How to lose a premiership !! Congratulations to Shore well played
The Front Rower
Ward Prentice (10)
There are also kids in the seconds that should be in the 1StXV poor team selections as well ….
Maul of Duty
Ward Prentice (10)
Yes, Kings backline defence did not get the job done today. Luckily their forwards were solid otherwise the score line would have been much worse for the Kingsmen
Where's the beef
Chris McKivat (8)
A short summary of the Joeys View game.
View controlled the first half. This was abley assisted by some of the officiating which was at times pedantic for both teams. View won hands down the kicking contest that Joeys seemed happy to participate in. Views forwards were more dominant as well. The first try was typically view, rolling a ball behind to get the chase. The second was terrible defence from joeys who had 4 players around a mid field bomb and let it bounce and bounce again for it to be swooped on to score on the bell. Every time joeys had the ball in the first half they either dropped it, were penalised or kicked it. All within the joeys half, often within the Joeys 22. The try they scored was the only visit to views 22, and they almost stuffed it.
At half time, looked like view were being gifted the chocolates inclusive of the box.
Second half saw an unfortunate kick off for view resulting in Joeys gaining a scrum deep in their 22, View infringed, and Joeys took the Tap and barged over thanks to a nice switch play with the backs.
The second that gave them the lead they worked it through the forwards. Joeys classy backs were nowhere to be found as View flooded the outside channels. The Joeys 12 was given some room and did take all on offer. The kicking game in the second half was more even and while you felt view was ontop in the forwards, it was not by much and they did not really trouble the joeys defence that much.
There was a moment in the second half where the View View play ducked and weaved and caught a joeys arm and joeys were fortunate that they were not down to 14 men with 11 to go. Having said that View was not troubling the joeys defence and to be fair, Joeys was not really troubling the view defence either.
A tight Contest, with View willing, but, Joeys, just had a touch more class when it mattered. The score was reflective of the game.
WTB
View controlled the first half. This was abley assisted by some of the officiating which was at times pedantic for both teams. View won hands down the kicking contest that Joeys seemed happy to participate in. Views forwards were more dominant as well. The first try was typically view, rolling a ball behind to get the chase. The second was terrible defence from joeys who had 4 players around a mid field bomb and let it bounce and bounce again for it to be swooped on to score on the bell. Every time joeys had the ball in the first half they either dropped it, were penalised or kicked it. All within the joeys half, often within the Joeys 22. The try they scored was the only visit to views 22, and they almost stuffed it.
At half time, looked like view were being gifted the chocolates inclusive of the box.
Second half saw an unfortunate kick off for view resulting in Joeys gaining a scrum deep in their 22, View infringed, and Joeys took the Tap and barged over thanks to a nice switch play with the backs.
The second that gave them the lead they worked it through the forwards. Joeys classy backs were nowhere to be found as View flooded the outside channels. The Joeys 12 was given some room and did take all on offer. The kicking game in the second half was more even and while you felt view was ontop in the forwards, it was not by much and they did not really trouble the joeys defence that much.
There was a moment in the second half where the View View play ducked and weaved and caught a joeys arm and joeys were fortunate that they were not down to 14 men with 11 to go. Having said that View was not troubling the joeys defence and to be fair, Joeys was not really troubling the view defence either.
A tight Contest, with View willing, but, Joeys, just had a touch more class when it mattered. The score was reflective of the game.
WTB
Where's the beef
Chris McKivat (8)
Next Week when I assume the wookies appear and Hunters Hill will decide if Joeys are contenders or in the dog fight.
Whataflanker
Frank Nicholson (4)
Good summary. Still amazed the Joeys player who instinctively coat hangered the View No. 9 in the second half didn’t get a yellow card. Officials also missed a crucial knock on 20m out from Joeys line after View 15 chased his own kick and put a massive shot on Joeys player who caught it. Hard to say who deserved to win it but records will show Joeys did so that’s all that matters.
CasualObserver
Sydney Middleton (9)
Ref also missed about 5 Riverview players not retreating when kick went up. It all evens out.
- Status