Hi all - I know not school rugby related, but seems some good rugby brains here, so thought I would ask (admin - pls delete if not appropriate)...
My older son is still playing club rugby (16s) as well as school. Not a high grade, but it is a small club with just a few teams and he still enjoys it.
We are increasingly seeing other teams wanting / needing to play uncontested scrums each week. Our team coach was a primary school teacher who was very encouraging of getting the big, slow, non sporty kids to come down and try rugby at the age of 10-12, even though in many cases these boys had tried other sports and had given up on them as a result of being fairly unathletic and not wanted. As a result of his encouragement, we have kept many of these boys interested in rugby and have 4-5 front rowers (in a squad of 20 kids). They aren't superstars destroying opposition, but put together make up a good solid scrum.
I get the safety aspect of things, but as soon as uncontested scrums get called, then opposition teams end up playing 4-5 backrowers, our backs get no space as the opposition backrow don't have to commit to the scrum fully and are free to break and fly at our 10 & 12. Some teams go every further and take the p@ss and put about 10 backs on the field. We then inevitably can't match their speed and they simply run us off our legs.
Surely there has to be some benefit to teams who can keep the rugby ethos of 'all shapes and sizes'? Ideas I have thought might work if you have to call for uncontested scrums:
- Defending backline has to move back an extra 10m off the scrum
- You have to take off your breakaways (and play with 13 players) vs our 15
- Free kick to us in place of a scrum if they knock on
Any thoughts?
My older son is still playing club rugby (16s) as well as school. Not a high grade, but it is a small club with just a few teams and he still enjoys it.
We are increasingly seeing other teams wanting / needing to play uncontested scrums each week. Our team coach was a primary school teacher who was very encouraging of getting the big, slow, non sporty kids to come down and try rugby at the age of 10-12, even though in many cases these boys had tried other sports and had given up on them as a result of being fairly unathletic and not wanted. As a result of his encouragement, we have kept many of these boys interested in rugby and have 4-5 front rowers (in a squad of 20 kids). They aren't superstars destroying opposition, but put together make up a good solid scrum.
I get the safety aspect of things, but as soon as uncontested scrums get called, then opposition teams end up playing 4-5 backrowers, our backs get no space as the opposition backrow don't have to commit to the scrum fully and are free to break and fly at our 10 & 12. Some teams go every further and take the p@ss and put about 10 backs on the field. We then inevitably can't match their speed and they simply run us off our legs.
Surely there has to be some benefit to teams who can keep the rugby ethos of 'all shapes and sizes'? Ideas I have thought might work if you have to call for uncontested scrums:
- Defending backline has to move back an extra 10m off the scrum
- You have to take off your breakaways (and play with 13 players) vs our 15
- Free kick to us in place of a scrum if they knock on
Any thoughts?