I wonder when GPS rugby will become a 5 team competition. There must be a limited commitment to tradition; multiple losses by Shore may lead to a re-think of their place in the GPS competition.
i should write something properly on this, FF (Folau Fainga'a), because there are so many issues involved. I will do so elsewhere with just a note here. Forgive me if I seem to be teaching grandmother to suck eggs. I am using your comment to make some broader points.
Nine schools play GPS rugby, six in the first and seconds, eight previously nine in the thirds. Eight schools are in Sydney, one in Armidale. To those from High or TAS or Grammar, GPS rugby is the thiirds. The existence of the thirds comp is the primary thing keeping one third of the GPS playing rugby
The GPS is a multi-sport competition. Parents and their children ultimately dictate what sports are played and by how many. As rugby has become more a numbers game, as its become more professional and powerful, as injuries have risen, parents are moving kids to other games. At TAS, the hockey club now has 140 players from junior to adult, including parents and alumni. It is the biggest club in the New England hockey competition offering multiple pathways. A TAS player has just made the u16 state side. Soccer numbers are higher.
At the TAS v Grammar game, Newington and Grammar were playing soccer on the next field. Parents from both schools were talking about the decline of rugby with some approval.
We are dealing with both cyclical and structural trends. Four years ago on these forums, the view was that the imbalance in both the CAS and GPS competitions had become such that the competitions should be merged. This was a rugby centred view and was never going to happen. Then both competitions seemed to balance to some degree helped, i think, by the wider pre-seasons. Two years ago, Cranbrook was the sick man of the CAS. This year they may win.
So on the cyclical side, what goes around comes around. Shore is weak in the firsts, but that may change. They did beat Scots in the thirds! However, there are the structural changes too.
Both High and Grammar fought hard, bravely to my mind, to stay in the GPS Firsts. As school demographics changed, as the number of boys playing rugby dropped, it became impossible, I don't think Shore is in quite the same position, but if it has to drop back to the seconds then that should be allowed. This brings me to my last point.
If rugby is to survive, let alone grow, we have to ensure that all kids who want to play can access games at their own level, forgetting our focus on the top and the association pecking orders. Even when i was at TAS, we struggled to some degree to get games. The position has become worse, in part because of the collapse of local school rugby. Last year TAS thirds had damn all games, making it hard to attract and retain boys. This year the thirds have had some games and have quite a good team even if TAS now has to recruit soccer and hockey players to build numbers for individual games!
TAS is a rugby school. The parents and school invest. Each time TAS plays in Sydney it costs parents over $18,000 for the games plus the add-on costs. That can be hard to sustain even with support from the Sydney schools through things such as use of boat sheds.
So is we are going to grow rugby, I think that we need to focus bottom up and ensure that every boy (and in the case of TAS every girl too) can get names. The top of the comp has its place, but its the total numbers that are important. I said that this was my last point, but I would add two things more.
I think that the GPS comp is over-dependent on Joeys and its huge number of teams at all levels. That's what in some ways keeps rugby going to the benefit of all. We do need more teams.
On the positive side, I think that the greater cooperation between CAS/ISA/GPs is playing a positive role in giving boys at all levels more opportunity to play. The top comps can and should remain separate,but the pre-seasons really are important.
Sorry for the length of the sermon, FF (Folau Fainga'a), but I have been mulling all these things over!