Ground is very good. The whole thing was rebuilt in the last 12 months. Good surface, good stand along one sideline and can hold a good crowd. It will be a good venue and the local rugby community will come along to support the Eagles.
Had this thought while sitting in traffic today. The ARU is designating $300k a season to assist with the Shute Shield broadcast. A broadcast that seems to have built a fairly solid advertiser base.
Now, while I'm a fan of the Shute Shield (I've watched it on TV every Saturday since I was 12) the $300k will only really go to helping one competition.
Perhaps the ARU could use that sum to offset some of Foxtel's costs in order to get a game or two each week broadcast on FTA. Worth a shot.
Looking forward to reading Papps next open letter if and when that happens WCR
Quick hands the only way nrc would be extended as you suggest is if Foxtel and sponsors would fund it. Problem is would also compete with super rugby so at best would only get fringe super rugby players outside of match day 23. Only way see long form domestic comp is we revamp our commitment to super rugby. So at this point your suggestion of nrc running from may to September I don't see as plausible unless rethink of super rugby happens and/ or broadcasters wishing to fund the expanded season which would conflict with there better rating super rugby product that at this point is completely unrealistic.I'm just watching the Wallaroos v Black Ferns match and heard the kiwi commentators discussing the difference between the preparation for each team. Our girls play club rugby and then have a three day carnival to pick the Australian team, while the kiwis have a NPC style competition for the ladies which is a much better preparation for test match rugby.
As I said a few pages back - I'd like to see a women's NRC with the games played before the men's games.
And in the context over the current brouhaha re the Papworth letter and talk of breakaway competitions etc, I'll restate my view that the NRC should move to a full two round home and away season from the end of May until the end of September. People said then that it couldn't be done because it would upset the clubs - now many of those same people are getting stuck into Papworth and the clubs.
Quick hands the only way nrc would be extended as you suggest is if Foxtel and sponsors would fund it. Problem is would also compete with super rugby so at best would only get fringe super rugby players outside of match day 23. Only way see long form domestic comp is we revamp our commitment to super rugby. So at this point your suggestion of nrc running from may to September I don't see as plausible unless rethink of super rugby happens and/ or broadcasters wishing to fund the expanded season which would conflict with there better rating super rugby product that at this point is completely unrealistic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would like to see this as a first measure:
Super Rugby unbroken season starting Feb
Club Rugby runs at the same time - start to finish
When Super Rugby finishes, inbound Test window
When Club Rugby finishes, NRC
NRC runs through inbound Test window and TRC. Because the Test window generally has a week off to start, then weeks off in the middle, it gives NRC time to run through a few more rounds.
Also allows NRC games to be curtain raisers.
Result is decent season length for everyone, players with match fitness available to step into Super/Test rugby at the appropriate level.
Gordon, Randwick and Manly play their first few rounds away from home, easily fixed. If Super rugby can play in February why can't club players?