Dam0...who wrote this and where can I find it. Ijust read it to Mrs Bullrush and we agree that it has to go on Facebook for all our Kiwi mates to enjoy
Dam0...who wrote this and where can I find it. Ijust read it to Mrs Bullrush and we agree that it has to go on Facebook for all our Kiwi mates to enjoy
Random question, but I would like to hear a few replies.What did we think of John "Knuckles' Connolly as Wallabies coach?
I honestly thought he had the potential to do extremely well with the Wallabies. He along with Link McKenzie are Queensland's best coaches.
It was really only an extension of his style coaching QLD. They, in spite of having one of the best provincial backlines ever assembled, played pretty much territory oriented footy most of the time. They were bloody successful though.
Connolly was the worst coach to ever coach the Wallabies. He perpetrated the great turnaround where we switched from a ball in hand style to the half-arsed field position game that we still see today, hot on the heels of an attack-ular 49-0 trouncing of the Boks, for no particular reason other than it was the way he liked his teams to play rugby.
On Gregor Paul's article: I can't say that one can take exception to the general thrust of the content.
I'm galled to say that it isn't too far off the mark.
I said in my comments on Bledisloe One - that we have the players to challenge the All Blacks but they don't have the same rugby upbringing of the Kiwis and you can see the effects of that in scoring incidents in every Bledisloe game - unless there is an exceptional performance, often matched by an inferior one from the guys in black.
It is no wonder that the South Africans are the All Blacks' fiercest competitors: because their rugby upbringing is similar.
There have been waves of parity between the Blacks and the Golds, when we had a group of very good and great players whose careers aligned - before and after the 1991 and 1999 RWCs - and theirs were aging or were otherwise less good, but mostly we have been in the trough of the waves.
We will have more crests in the future because we will always have periods when the careers of very good or great players align, but to have a sea change—to have more of those crests pounding into the shore—we have to improve the rugby structure in our country.
.
Seriously though, sports journalists have to be right at the bottom of the totem pole, in a profession that most punters already rate pretty lowly (me included). But let's face it, our cricket press can be just as bad when it comes to arrogance.
There have been waves, but mostly we have been in the trough of the waves. We will have more crests in the future, but to have a sea change—to have more of those crests pounding into the shore.
.
game day...pumped!!
Pumped is the wrong word for me. I've got that hollowed out feeling in the pit of my stomach because I know that NZ would have been flogged by their coaches during the week due to a less than spectacular performance in a number of areas. They will be much improved this week, especially in the set piece. We not only have to raise our standard of play to meet their last week's performance but also to match the improvement they will have made.
Secondly its Wellington. When its not raining there (which is very often in winter) it still blows a gale 90% of the time and the cake tin breeze swirls uncomfortably for all. Kicking requires a change of technique that NZ are used to - our kicking game is usually shite in near perfect conditions, especially our field kicking. To'omua, Mogg and Lilo need to have a blinder with the boot.
So, while there is hope that we can make the right improvements, this game could very easily go south very quickly. I'm nervous, but still hopeful we will see a major improvement and a close game.