I would like to propose a name which is evocative of the Sydney University and Balmain areas and their historic associations with colonial days. That name is the Sydney Coves.
Call me weird, but I love the name.
Agree with the criticism of whingers. We can almost guarantee that it won't be perfect in Year 1 but it will be a start.
Criticism of rushing it through is more valid (and the reason for it was probably waiting to get the broadcaster to underwrite it). But if it was left to 2015 these same people would complain about the stupidity of starting it in a RWC year—just as they did last time.
Law changes
As I wrote in the New Aussie Competitions blog in January:
There should be nothing in NRC law variations that enable players to duck physical contests or to avoid the technical requirements they will need in future rugby.
But, as others have mentioned, there should be a law variation to reduce the time to take kicks at goal.
I postulated in the blog that 45 seconds should be the maximum time allowed. People who object to that as impossible should think
"What if $10,000 was given for every credible attempt at goal made in 45 seconds". They would realise that it is possible, after all.
(No, don't mention why the $10K idea would be a bad thing—it's not the point.)
The other harmless change I would like to see is the abolition of the "numbers" law in the lineout. People said in 2007 that this ELV for the ARC was harmful and gave some elegant reasons why.
I watched a heap of ARC games, live, on TV or from back-channel recordings looking at this matter and the nice objections to the "no numbers" ELV were not validated.
Instead we saw the retention of another reason to stop the game.
Was that not a bad thing?
.