Blue
Andrew Slack (58)
Biffo said:Blue said:Biffo said:I watched the 2003 RWC final in a bar in Polokwane.
My two Australian mates and I were among 150 Saffers, to a man screaming furiously for the poms. An interesting experience.
Something I would not wish on my worst enemy. You're still alive. You're lucky.
Not surprising. South Africans generally don't see the need to compete with the Poms at every turn and don't feel the same level of disdain for the Poms if I may be so bold.
It's basically a case of the rivalry they feel with Australians being a stronger emotion. The English speaking South Africans don't have the same negative connotation with the Poms as the Aussies do. The colonial histories of the two countries are different.
Somehow the Afrikaners on the whole have made peace with the fact that the Poms chucked our wives and kids in concentration camps and starved them. (PS and got Australian soldiers to mind them but that's a whole other story).
Ask your average Saffer why he doesn't like Aussies and he'll mumble something like "arrogant", "Shane Warne", "parochial" but there will be no real conviction to his answer.
In short, the average Saffer in SA hates an Aussie more than a Pom but he can't really tell you why because he hasn't met many Aussies, if any.
I think there is also this thing that Saffers feel they need to compete with Aussies. Both colonies stuck on the arse end of the earth. Both chucked in the bush and having to fend against the elements, the great colonial oppressor etc etc. That bred a bit of competitiveness in a weird sort of way if that makes any sense.
It's only once I moved here that I realised both nations actually know absolutely sweet fuck all about one another and have based their views on a lot of cliches, most incorrect or badly influenced by Shane Warne and a Monty Python skit.
The converse shaped by Rich South Africans coming to Australians, buying houses on hills and a boat or two and using the words "when we" all too often. Oh and Bakkies Botha as well as other testosterone charged individuals play their role of course.
I shall buy you a beer for that statement if ever we meet my dear fellow.Biffo said:I am not a vengeful fellow. In 2007 I strongly supported the Bokke against the poms in the RWC final. Now I will be supporting the Bokke against the EEELs which is a ridiculous concept.
Bokke 3-0
Thanks for the exposition, Mate. Little of it was new to me - I have spent about 10 months in that glorious country and thus know a little about its people. Some of our fellow members of the board may find this exchange enlightening.
I went to Port Elizabeth three weeks after the 2003 RWC final. I had the great delight of meeting several much younger than I South Africans (Afrikaaner and Anglo in origin) for a few drinks on a few occasions. We discussed my Piet Polokwane incident and they opined pretty much as you have. They did raise the point that many South Africans detested Australians because they won so much. We then looked at what had happened in Australian sport in the three weeks since the RWC final - the Kangaroos annihilated Great Britain in the third RL test on the same day as the RWC final and Australians had then gone on to win something like men's and women's world cup hockey, a world surfing championship, a big golf championship, the Davis Cup (?) and a world triathlon championship. All that in three weeks rather overshadows missing out on the RWC. One lady commented "you'd better not go back to Piet Polokwane now"! She couldn't have been more wrong - after the RWC final, every Saffer in that bar wanted to buy beers for me and my two mates and could not have been more pleasant. A people of great contrasts.
Should I point out to our board that Piete Polokwane is the real heart of Blue Bull territory?
From Pietersburg to Port Elizabeth - more condolences!
Quite right, and the cricket was really what got a lot of people worked up over the years.
That's what we have in common though. Fiercely competitive but up for a laugh when the dust settles.