T
Train Without a Station
Guest
Based on the process, are the ARU within their rights to appeal the decision?
You think?
If I were her,I might give a statement, but no fucking way am I going to any hearing now that I have resigned.
I wouldn't need the stress,there is nothing in it for me.
A chance to have her say in the correct forum (the tribunal) - not in a crappy interview in the paper the following week. She had an opportunity to impact on the outcome that , but failed to do so. That's what was in it for her.
As I said perviously, its just setting it up for a lawsuit. eg. "I Felt bullied", not "I was bullied". Im guessing she wasnt bullied at all, its just one of the key words the lawyers suggested she throw in to the interview.
A chance to have her say in the correct forum (the tribunal) - not in a crappy interview in the paper the following week. She had an opportunity to impact on the outcome that , but failed to do so. That's what was in it for her.
As I said perviously, its just setting it up for a lawsuit. eg. "I Felt bullied", not "I was bullied". Im guessing she wasnt bullied at all, its just one of the key words the lawyers suggested she throw in to the interview.
It's unfortunate that this saga has attracted some very nasty people to this forum over the past few weeks.....
Because neither of them know anything. Just trying to make themselves seem important. Presenting themselves as the resource for everything rugby but really knowing fuck all. I just the words of all the mods on GAGR then them.
actually I disagree, the courts will be her correct forum, the tribunal was only about Beale admitting to sending one sexist text and not two not how she was treated. He admitted his guilt.
There are specific laws and procedures about that to test her claims, have a look at the link below
http://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/.../work-behaviours/workplace-sexual-harassment/
The smartest thing the ARU can do is throw money and support at her, and get her to sign a NDA so it goes away
I can't stand Rebecca Wilson's style of journalism, but to suggest she doesn't know anything about this situation is clearly incorrect.
Some of the early claims she presented have been proved correct.
Every journalist reporting on this saga have got some things correct and others incorrect. There are clearly multiple versions of the 'truth' being circulated by the various parties involved from the players to the ARU boardmembers.
I expect that if the ARU tries to put a stop to the saga now I expect that the source of the second message will start being leaked.
actually I disagree, the courts will be her correct forum, the tribunal was only about Beale admitting to sending one sexist text and not two; and not how she was treated. He admitted his guilt.
There are specific laws and procedures about that to test her claims, have a look at the link below
http://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/.../work-behaviours/workplace-sexual-harassment/
The smartest thing the ARU can do is throw money and support at her, and get her to sign a NDA so it goes away