Strewthcobber
Simon Poidevin (60)
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...l/news-story/4103fd2003978072fc72dfa80f1bf58fWhere has this been said, FP?
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...l/news-story/4103fd2003978072fc72dfa80f1bf58fWhere has this been said, FP?
Where has this been said, FP?
“I thought Quade last year... the team struggled, his game management, his attack, his defence (struggled).
It staggers me the attitudes that some have in relation to trial by media. And a determination to call guilty even if not supported by court or even police prosecutor.
Not a standard that would be accepted anywhere else in society. At any rate, he still has charges pending.
Let's wait and see.
You’re reading. But maybe not enough critical thinking? My take on this is just how well behaved Quade has been with the press under extraordinary situation. Brad should now be held to appropriate levels of performance. To start with his coaching in 2018 needs to well exceed Quade’s performance at 10 in 2017.https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...l/news-story/4103fd2003978072fc72dfa80f1bf58f
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
You’re reading. But maybe not enough critical thinking? My take on this is just how well behaved Quade has been with the press under extraordinary situation.
I think it was his performance on the field that got him sent club land; Hunt has put in some decent shifts, so is likely to be forgiven. That is the way it works, not fair, but reality
Two explanations for that
Either QC (Quade Cooper) has truly matured and has been treated horribly
Or he acted like such a dick that he doesn’t want to give Thorne a reason to come clean on the real circumstances.
Both scenarios are quite possible.
"decent shifts" would be as in baseline acceptable or slightly above at best. Anywhere near what his pay grade would reasonably expect, no. IMHO he has been incredibly average and a very poor performing investment. At his age his peak, given injuries (even setting aside the issues of substances and bringing the game into disrepute) is past and he is likely at best to be a consistently average or better than average performer. A Rob Horne of the Reds with none of the historical good performances to prove his peak skills in Rugby. Then add in the downside for the negative influence of his previous convictions and now this fiasco and there should be no doubt what the outcome should be.
We are talking about a Wallaby here right?
Wish we had a few more players who were as “consistently average”
Whether the bloke is guilty of the offence (that is, necessary to be found guilty in a Court) or not is not the issue for me.
He plead to the first offence some years ago. He was dealt with very lightly by the Reds. He is very highly paid and made the Wallabies (although I thought he did not deserve that as his playing level was sub standard for that level).
He has been a sad fit for the Reds. No-one really is keen to associate with him on a private level ( as they don't want to get caught up in any of his shit).
The bloke has bought the game and the Reds as well as the Wallabies into disrepute.
The integrity of the game and the kids following the game is a lot more important than the short term future of a non deserving player ewho is nearly at the end of his career.
Fuck him off.
Putting aside whether they should, i doubt they can just fire the bloke on suspicion. Guilty verdict would probably be needed if they want to avoid a payout.
I'd be in Court the next day if my boss tried to sack me on 'suspicion' of something.
I wonder if RA conducted any drug testing of Hunt shortly after the arrest as they would be entitled to do under their policies?