Jumping_jack
Ward Prentice (10)
Biggest shocks would have to be Mackenzie (C) and Marchant (C).
MacKenzie was pickedBiggest shocks would have to be Mackenzie (C) and Marchant (C).
Mackenzie is a 1sts Backrower and should be number 8. In my opinion - I have been wrong many times though no doubt. So I could be wrong here.MacKenzie was picked
Agree Marchant very hard done by
To be honest, across 1 and 2 are very strong back rows. Not hard done by to be 2's or 1's for any of them.Mackenzie is a 1sts Backrower and should be number 8. In my opinion - I have been wrong many times though no doubt. So I could be wrong here.
Orr probably the victim of only a couple of games back since injury unfortunately….. still time to get a call up or skip straight through to Gen Blue Academy which has happened before I think?To be honest, across 1 and 2 are very strong back rows. Not hard done by to be 2's or 1's for any of them.
Still can't believe that Jarvis isn't there though!
Ok, genuine question….. what’s better for the player and/or future Rugby Australia:And the annoying thing is he is beaten by an u16s kid.. who will be on the u16s pathway anyway. So they have stopped a potential senior kid, and had no positive impact on the 16s kid.
And if they are better, I really believe they should be the next great union player to be picked as an u16s in opens..
So far the CAS results have shown it isn’t working. Think back to when other u16s have been selected- each year they have been found out and even put in dangerous situations.
I dunno, you pick the best team, don't you? If the U16 kid is going to be a Wallaby, he benefits from the tougher challenge. "Experiencing struggle" is what makes you better.Ok, genuine question….. what’s better for the player and/or future Rugby Australia:
1. Making the best u16s play u16s and getting used to being dominant/enjoying success
2. Making the best u16s play up early and being less dominant/experiencing struggle
??
*edit that (barkers seconds won 26-0) wrong way aroundIt's a shame AI can't fill the rest of these in. But there ought enough of you pass on some scores from the last 2 weeks so we can do up some tables. Thanks again @Mule for posting yours.
Another ugly weekend for Aloys, only one team (the age group who were the best of the school last year) getting any points at all.
View attachment 19650
Cranbrook 15as lost 47-12Thanks all. So we can do tables, we need:
Round 1: Trinity v Barker 16As, 15As and 13As
Round 2: Knox v Trinity 15As and 14s. Cranbrook v Waverley 15As.
Promising signs from Trinity. How did the Trinity side look?Knox 19 - 15 Trinity
Sounds like we need someone from Trinity with access to scores to fill in the blanks.So we can do tables, we need: