All,
I have been a long-time fan of this web-site, and after reading the posts in this forum of late, I am compelled to make this post and “stick my head above the parapet” so to speak.
I suppose I am in a pretty good position to comment on the Waverley vs Barker 1st XV game at Queens Park last Saturday, as I was one of the Assistance Referees, not the one who reported the punching, but on the far side of the field when the issue occurred. I also was the referee for the 2nd XV game (which was quite a good game to referee, and a lot closer than the 28-7 final scoreline read).
From the discussions with my fellow officials at ‘oranges’ during the 1st XV game, there was clear evidence of punching being seen by the Barker player, so the end result is a no-brainer – red card as per the laws for U-19 Aust. age group players. As to what caused the Barker player to retaliate, there appears to be an indication in this forum that he was provoked – if so it is not the players responsibility to take the law into their own hands (I know this is not easy to do – I played the game for approx. 20 years before I took up refereeing).
The ref in question is a very fine referee indeed, and I have known him for a long time now – he handled this quality CAS 1st XV schools game quite well, and his decision making was spot on. As discussed in the forum he *could* have escalated sooner in the 2nd half when Waverley were penalised 4-5 penalties on the trot, but that is a judgement call every ref needs to make during a game – we all referee to what is called “material effect”; i.e. – if a transgression has occurred, and if it did not affect play, then play on (but discuss and manage at the next appropriate time so there are no repeat instances; if there are repeat instances, then penalise and then escalate to a caution if required).
For everyone’s information there was a very experienced referee coach assessing both myself and the 1st XV referee on Saturday at Queens Park, and he said after the 1st XV match that the Ref did a great job – and this specific referee coach is not the type to give out such praise quite candidly.
I appreciate ‘HJ’ copying the code of conduct for everyone to read – I wish all rugby teams – schools, Subbies, Women’s, premier, junior, etc all read this and abided by it; unfortunately this does not appear to be the case. Every referee (who has refereed for any period of time) has a horror story they can recall of being verbally (and in some cases – physically) abused, spat on, harassed and threatened during and after matches. I do know that the incident reports are growing every year to the Referees Department, and this year is no exception.
This season is one of worst I have seen (10 years now) whereby we are seriously lacking in refereeing numbers – when Schools are on (CAS, ISA, and GPS) plus Subbies and Premier grade there are double-ups galore, and a good proportion of referees are always doing 2 games on Saturday – and that doesn’t include lower aged school games in the morning, and SJRU games on Sunday. I have lost count of the number of new referees to the associations who have said ‘I am not going to cop this abuse any more on my Saturdays’ and have simply stopped refereeing the game they love.
Refereeing is not easy; it requires utmost concentration, learning to be in the right position at the right time, an acceptable level of fitness (and having the ability to move quickly as well as sufficient stamina) plus unfaltering law knowledge. Unfortunately our mistakes – and we do make them (but we try to minimise them as much as possible) – can be glaringly obvious as compared to a forward pass, or a missed tackle or dropped ball.
Saturdays CAS game between Waverley and Barker was an intense schoolboy match that easily rivalled a GPS match in skills and pace – all the lads should hold their heads up high for producing such a great effort and providing a good game of rugby for the crowd who watched.
Rugby Ref