Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Not on the internet its not.It's not binary. It's OK to say someone's really good in isolation!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Not on the internet its not.It's not binary. It's OK to say someone's really good in isolation!
Fuck that was frustrating as hell. I obviously can’t whinge too much about the reffing because of the score at the end but a 14 point turnaround from Kerevi’s no try (That should've been a try to Kerevi, without a doubt. It wasn't the first time he blew his whistle prematurely though.) to Carter’s try at that point in the game it’s hard not to. I can’t help think that Kerevis try is awarded and we would back our selves to close it out from there. Instead we are up the other end after Carter crawls across the line to be 10 points down (Nothing wrong with that try).
Then a comedy of small errors from the officials that go against us. The silver boots guy going out but not called by Leckie. Douglas no arms penalty - how that can be called a shoulder charge is beyond me (Really? That was textbook shoulder charge. It was lazy by Douglas - absolutely no intention to use his arms. Its as only worth a penalty though and thankfully the ref didn't give him a yellow card.), first contact was with the arm that apparently he didn’t use!?
Anyway, we got beat, I hope all the injured players tonight are ok. McCaffrey will be a big loss and I hope he’s back soon for you guys.
Honestly, halfway into the first half I was going to have a coach rant and claim that the Reds had this game won.... what happened?
The Douglas contact was literally ONLY with his arm, it was more of a coat hanger then a shoulder only!
Good 7’s always make sure they get the benefit of the doubt. Richie McCall made a career out of that.Brumbies much better tonight and did get the favourable calls. The no try for the Teds was a turning point.
Pocock is good but tend to think he also gets the benefit of the doubt on most occasions.
McCaffrey will be a big loss and I hope he’s back soon for you guys.
This year that ruling has been applied in the Australian inter-conference matches but elsewhere it has been very variable. In NZ inter-conference matches I don't think it has ever been carded and it tends to happen once per match. In a SA vs Waratahs game it also occurred and it was not even a penalty although it prevented Beale from scoring.
- CFS had a really good game, aside from his yellow card (that I philosophically disagree with, but was the correct decision)
If the CFS was a yellow that should be too!
I must admit I struggle with it being a yellow card offence in every instance. To me, it is often a reflex action and I thought that was the case yesterday.
I am okay with the low tolerance to things like should charges and lifting tackles because of the player safety involved but losing a player for 10 minutes to a non-deliberate action which doesn’t present a safety risk is flawed IMO. Part of the skill of draw and pass is to successfully make the pass before the defender can close it down after all.
The difference, Zero, is that Pocock propelled the ball towards his own goal line, so not a knock on and clearly a legitimate action. The YC only comes into play when the ball is "deliberately" knocked on, ie, propelled towards the opposition goal line.