It's nice to think, but a photo opportunity with a gold medallist is worth more to a politician than someone without. Likewise, it's easier to justify funding for a program that delivers gold medals rather than one that hasn't delivered a medal since Rio. My understanding is some of the AIS funding distribution is directly related to the chance of the program delivering a medal as well, so every chance that might drop off in the next cycle.
Hopefully funding still gets pushed through, but would have been an easier sell with some gold medals to show off