Australian Rugby / RA
- Thread starter Dave Beat
- Start date
Doritos Day
Johnnie Wallace (23)
Good news, he's a spud
Slim 293
Stirling Mortlock (74)
That sounds like something they'd report...
Doritos Day
Johnnie Wallace (23)
Super Rugby needs to be run by an independent body that is only concerned/self-interested in that competition.
It will forever be sliding backwards in its current state with ties to R.A. and NZRU.
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
Would RA's constitution allow McLennan to be an Executive Chairman? That appears to be how he sees himself.
Dan54
David Wilson (68)
And isn't that meant o be what's happening next year? Perhaps Andy got the job as CEO of that board?
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
^ please no.
qwerty51
Stirling Mortlock (74)
Is it? Where can I read that?
KOB1987
John Eales (66)
Wrong Phil.....Phil Waugh
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
"The new agreement will usher in a new governance model for Super Rugby Pacific with the establishment of a nine-person board, which will include an independent Chair, four independent Directors, and one representative each from NZR, RA, the New Zealand Rugby Players Association (NZRPA), Rugby Union Players’ Association (RUPA).
"The Board will oversee the competition with the purpose of a clear, unbiased focus on governance, and the creation of a consistent look and feel across the competition."
SUPER RUGBY PACIFIC LOCKED IN UNTIL 2030
super.rugby
Wallaby Man
Nev Cottrell (35)
Wouldn’t surprise me if we see Marinos turn up as the new independent Super Rugby commissioner/chairman etc.
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
^ I'm assuming the independent chairman & board members will be appointed by RA, NZR etc. by consensus: hard to see RA sacking him today then agreeing to make him chairman of the new entity anytime soon. Could possibly be a contender for CEO but that would be a bit provocative on the part of the new board. My bet is he'll turn up back at SARU or maybe WR (World Rugby) if he sticks with rugby at all.
Wallaby Man
Nev Cottrell (35)
This isn’t a sacking.
It’s more a reading of the room and moving to save face as there might be workings in the background for a candidate that people wanted or a situation where he has another opportunity with more long term stability.
It’s more a reading of the room and moving to save face as there might be workings in the background for a candidate that people wanted or a situation where he has another opportunity with more long term stability.
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
Unless there's misconduct we don't know about it's a sacking but of the kind where you let the guy leave with his dignity officially intact & a nice severance with attached NDA to the ease the way.
kiap
Steve Williams (59)
Yeah, McLennan just had a bit of a stumble putting out some lame bantz. Please, not a major faceplant by installing Waugh.
Wallaby Man
Nev Cottrell (35)
He’s at RA for another month so 100% isn’t a sacking. Smells of a personal decision because either something better offered or at least something popped up for long term stability because he could see would be potentially moved on in the next 6-12months. Or like you said back in RSA for personal reasons
