I wish I had the kind of money to just throw at random footballers because I fancy it.It's somewhat funny money though because Rugby Australia certainly won't be footing anywhere close to the whole bill.
I'd bet pretty much anything that someone who is really keen on Sua'ali'i playing rugby has fronted up a lot of money to make it happen.
I wonder if it is the Kings Old Boy referred to earlier in the thread?
That's probably true however Sua'ali'i was in year 10 and 16 years old the last of the 2 years he played 1st xvBeing an avid watcher of GPS rugby for a number of years, Jorgensen was a far superior player at FB for Joeys than Sua'ali'i was at Kings in their time playing 1st XV. It seems like an extraordinary amount of money for a kid who played 5 years of rugby while at Kings.
Agreed. We could potentially have Jorgensen, Sua'ali'i and Petaia as a back 3 at some stage all in their prime. Athletically could be the most impressive back 3 ever, let’s see how they turn out as rugby players but no doubting the potential there.I really don’t get these attitudes, do you want to win or not? Everyone complains we don’t have the talent to compete and all our best talent is playing league. Now he signs and it’s all do we really need him?
Unfortunately our players have options unlike other countries, if we want the best, we have to pay the best.
No thanksI wonder what we could offer Zach Fittler? He might be the most valuable.
I wonder what we could offer Zach Fittler? He might be the most valuable.
I think let him take the same path as JS, i.e. prove himself against men, assess his strengths and weaknesses, and if appropriate make an offer.No thanks
The absolute teeth gnashing from the NRL world is worth 1.6 aloneSome thoughts on the Suallii situation, I wonder how much is related to Rugby Australia negotiating a new broadcast agreement for 2025 and the Private Equity discussion.
it’s interesting when you listen to McLennan talk about the signing, he lists 3 key factors behind the signing and price paid; crowds, commercial revenue and on-field performance.
Just look at the amount of media coverage it has generated this week, and likewise the Eddie Jones signing and subsequent media engagement.
*understand the on-field contribution is been discussed in other threads, just wanted an area to discuss the commercial factors.
It's as hilarious as it is cringeworthy. The loaves of hypocrisy are well baked.The absolute teeth gnashing from the NRL world is worth 1.6 alone
The same was said about Folau signing and even bigger cause he would attract AFL supporters due to he played in 3 footy codesSome thoughts on the Suallii situation, I wonder how much is related to Rugby Australia negotiating a new broadcast agreement for 2025 and the Private Equity discussion.
it’s interesting when you listen to McLennan talk about the signing, he lists 3 key factors behind the signing and price paid; crowds, commercial revenue and on-field performance.
Just look at the amount of media coverage it has generated this week, and likewise the Eddie Jones signing and subsequent media engagement.
*understand the on-field contribution is been discussed in other threads, just wanted an area to discuss the commercial factors.
‘An injection of funds’ of ~500k for 3yrs is, and would achieve, sweet fuck all
Amazing that campo just hashtagged his own name and nickname
I hate this argument, while we need to invest heavily in the club game don’t get me wrong if we are unable to retain players in union then we are stuffed anyway
Reminds me when he tweeted about the Aus 7s side winning the HK tournament and had to remind everyone the last time they won it - he was playing.Amazing that campo just hashtagged his own name and nickname