Marce
John Hipwell (52)
They hate Rugby?I think its more about it being The Courier Mail than we are cheaper than the others.
They hate Rugby?I think its more about it being The Courier Mail than we are cheaper than the others.
its locally known as The Bronco Mail, after the local rugby league team.They hate Rugby?
Sure, but running it after the club season isn't just "something at the end" - there's still a fair few tests to run in the year at that point and Wallabies pushing for selection or coming back from injury need somewhere to do it. Running post club season also means the squad players get both the higher level game time and the club game time, ensuring the standards rise there too. If we're trying to make sure those squad guys are getting 30+ games of rugby per year then ~10 extra games of NRC instead of club rugby isn't enough, they're going to need as much of the club season as possible to get there. Also worth noting that some of those higher level club players arguably need a full club season to make sure they're ready for NRC.
Look I'm no big fan of club rugby either, but trying to run another competition at the same time that sucks even more players out of it just seems inefficent and spiteful, aside from being politically impossible.
You seem to think Im attacking them, I'm not at all, I just come from different sports where players who get rep duty aren't available because they are playing better grades, and the people from there clubs are happy for them and excited they got to a new level.No one is arguing that we don't need to do something different, just that there's literally no good reason to attack club rugby when there's a perfectly good and arguably better window for the competition immediately afterwards. We need to be bringing people into the tent, not pushing them out.
This perfectly encapsulates the problem. Club rugby doesn't cut it as a pro pathway that is only one step below Super Rugby (particularly SS). But it also stands in the way of anything else being put in place.Appreciate your different point of view Tomikin but I don't think I can agree on this one.
One of the big draw cards for clubs at the back end of their season is the returning non-Wallaby Super Rugby players. It draws bigger crowds to home games and usually quite a number of spectators who are casual invested. Not to mention the experience they bring being in the club setup for a couple of weeks, it can leave a lasting impression on the next generation.
I don't think any solutions where clubs are deprived of their returning Super Rugby players and also have a number of their other top players removed from the team is the solution for making rugby great again in Australia. Why bother having Super Rugby contracted players even nominate for a club team if they're going to play Super Rugby all year and then roll straight into another competition?
I also appreciate this is likely a more strongly held opinion by those in NSW and QLD. So for a more impartial opinion - I don't think competing against Australia's other main codes in August/September/October is a great idea either from a viewership perspective. Playing the 'new NRC' at the end of club season means open slather in terms of being the only televised local footy being played.
I know who are the Broncos but is there a rivalry between Broncos and Reds supporters?its locally known as The Bronco Mail, after the local rugby league team.
Definitely agree that club rugby in it's current format doesn't cut it as the next level below Super Rugby, I don't think any of the recent posts on here support that idea either.This perfectly encapsulates the problem. Club rugby doesn't cut it as a pro pathway that is only one step below Super Rugby (particularly SS). But it also stands in the way of anything else being put in place.
Super Rugby guys shouldn't be dropping to non-professional rugby. Except after retirement maybe.
Well that isn’t what I said was it Tomikin?So lets do what we are doing now.. and all will be great in the world.
I genuinely wonder if there are any. NRC following Club failed to get buy in from SS.Well that isn’t what I said was it Tomikin?
How about you consider options which don’t alienate club rugby and those fans/players.
Then the NSWRU need to follow suit of the QRU and take control of the teams and the allocations.I genuinely wonder if there are any. NRC following Club failed to get buy in from SS.
Okay, my comment wasn't really helpful...Well that isn’t what I said was it Tomikin?
How about you consider options which don’t alienate club rugby and those fans/players.
I’ve been a staunch supporter of a 3rd tier for years, this isn’t a debate about the benefits of a tier, rather the process of achieving that.Okay, my comment wasn't really helpful...
Do you really believe that clubs will fail if they have their players in rep teams during the season? Clubs will promote other players like they do during Super Rugby and if we start the let's just call it the NRC a few weeks after the final with the same teams without international we can fit in a metric shit ton more of high-quality matches...
Someone mentioned that the difference in PROFESSIONAL matches played between Marcus Smith and Noah Leoliso is Marcus has played 123 times and Noah has around 27 caps.
Wouldnt that be better for Australian Rugby..
I’ve been a staunch supporter of a 3rd tier for years, this isn’t a debate about the benefits of a tier, rather the process of achieving that.
Alienating club rugby and its fans isn’t the means to do that, club rugby holds its part as a critical piece of Australian rugby. And right or wrong, the weight of political influence of club rugby is strong and will derail any proposal where the attitude and impact towards clubs is “tough shit”. It will just be wasted energy and money that RA doesn’t have.
what is better for Australian rugby is an outcome where we get a 3rd tier, and don’t go through a civil war or destroy club rugby in the process.
Also Aus A is our nominated second team. Meaning capping fringe players at that level will mean they can’t go and play test rugby elsewhereIt's to give them game time to justify their inclusion in the squad. Even if they only get 5000 into the stadium midweek it's hard to see what the downside is, unless one of the A players picks up an injury, but that's a risk at anytime. You'd think that longer term the net benefits would far outweigh the negatives.
The used to pause the season for the June tests and then worked hard to get hem moved to July to avoid the break, so I can't really see Australia or New Zealand going back to that.Would Super Rugby ever continue through the internationals like the NH competitions do? Or do we not have the depth with only 5 teams. I find it an interesting time with the leading teams handicapped.
That’s 10 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video is a load of shit France will win the 6 nations and they have 28 pro clubs that they draw players fromThis is a beaut little video on the importance of having a system that produces cohesion if you want to have successful professional teams:
The rise and decline of Australian Rugby Union - EXPLAINED
A short summary analysis of how Australian rugby union and the national team known as The Wallabies rose to success in the 1980s and then dropped in internat...t.co
It's not a call to cut a Super Rugby team, but I think it does explain the key reason why the Wallabies have fallen from their lofty position since the early 2000's.