Wilson
Phil Kearns (64)
Yeah, economically simultaneous Australia A tours are probably a ways off right now. If they're going to happen it'll be on some sort of appearance fee basis - teams like the USA paying to get Australia A over to give their guys more game time or possibly world rugby sponsoring tier 1 A team tours to get more games in tier 2 nations. Neither of those things seem super likely at the moment though.Yep so in that case, a touring Aussie squad would need to take at least 50-60 players away, because you'd be playing both a test side and an A side as their own squads in different parts of the world. I'm not sure Australian rugby has the depth or funds at the moment to be taking away that many players.
There are a lot of different cases being put forward so it's good to see this driving conversation.
It sounds like most people would be keen for some type of A team to be brought back into the fold.
The one version of mid-week games that could probably happen now is playing against major European clubs. There's still probably need to be some sort of appearance fee, but I could definitely see a major French or English club seeing it as a money spinner. That would have to be a mid week side playing as the Wallabies though, it would live and die on it's marketability as much as anything else.
Home based Australia A games are much more likely at this stage, ideally played during the July test series and maybe in the home rounds of the Rugby Championship, but they have to be careful with scheduling. If an NRC equivalent does get up the worst thing they could do is pull players out of it for Australia A.