RedsHappy
Tony Shaw (54)
The gravest mistake Link has made so far in his time with the Wallabies has nothing to with selections.
Rather he's made a dangerous, serious mistake in retaining the previous regime's assistant coaches in Blades and Scrivener, combined with a lurch to the comforting known in J McKay who sadly produced nothing innovative or effective in the Reds' attack since 2011. Further, unlike the ABs, no specialist kicking and mental skills coaches have been retained. Blades and Scrivener were essentially picked by Nucifora in early 2012, and they have produced nothing in terms of Wallaby defensive excellence and set piece or breakdown skill. They are not up to it, whilst far superior choices like, for example, L Fisher remain outside the Wallaby zone.
The Wallabies - like it or not - desperately need top quality technical coaching on virtually every aspect of elite rugby. The below-Wallaby Australian development system does not produce enough truly Test-ready elite players, and the right type of coaching and related man management skills are the only way to respond and compensate.
In short, the new CEO of the Wallaby team enterprise has so far mismanaged his organisation design and the results are and will be fully consequential to that.
The worrying omen a la Link was/is the decline in coaching intensity, success and application within the Reds coaching in 2012-13 leading to growing Reds inconsistency and attacking mediocrity. One Super title was seemingly enough for Link, he deemed himself thereafter ready for 'bigger things', but crucially, he didn't get better himself, he rested on laurels and gradually forgot the massive role his entire management team played in 2011's success. That team broke up through 2012 and things were never the same again.
The ARU's ongoing financial debacle and gross extravagance under JO'N may be factor in the so far poor investment decisions re a wholly new Wallaby coaching group. But one thing's for sure: successful elite team coaching in this era requires an outstanding, total coaching staff and S&C specialists. Compromise or mis-judge around that truth - as so often did Deans - and the prices will be heavy, enduring and, commercially speaking in terms of code income over time, highly expensive.
Link needs to make major organizational changes within the Wallaby management system very soon. If he does not and constructs himself as the central genius able to live with mediocre puppets underneath him, the Deans era will quickly look good in comparison (even though Link inherited a de-skilled, demotivated and rudderless team).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Rather he's made a dangerous, serious mistake in retaining the previous regime's assistant coaches in Blades and Scrivener, combined with a lurch to the comforting known in J McKay who sadly produced nothing innovative or effective in the Reds' attack since 2011. Further, unlike the ABs, no specialist kicking and mental skills coaches have been retained. Blades and Scrivener were essentially picked by Nucifora in early 2012, and they have produced nothing in terms of Wallaby defensive excellence and set piece or breakdown skill. They are not up to it, whilst far superior choices like, for example, L Fisher remain outside the Wallaby zone.
The Wallabies - like it or not - desperately need top quality technical coaching on virtually every aspect of elite rugby. The below-Wallaby Australian development system does not produce enough truly Test-ready elite players, and the right type of coaching and related man management skills are the only way to respond and compensate.
In short, the new CEO of the Wallaby team enterprise has so far mismanaged his organisation design and the results are and will be fully consequential to that.
The worrying omen a la Link was/is the decline in coaching intensity, success and application within the Reds coaching in 2012-13 leading to growing Reds inconsistency and attacking mediocrity. One Super title was seemingly enough for Link, he deemed himself thereafter ready for 'bigger things', but crucially, he didn't get better himself, he rested on laurels and gradually forgot the massive role his entire management team played in 2011's success. That team broke up through 2012 and things were never the same again.
The ARU's ongoing financial debacle and gross extravagance under JO'N may be factor in the so far poor investment decisions re a wholly new Wallaby coaching group. But one thing's for sure: successful elite team coaching in this era requires an outstanding, total coaching staff and S&C specialists. Compromise or mis-judge around that truth - as so often did Deans - and the prices will be heavy, enduring and, commercially speaking in terms of code income over time, highly expensive.
Link needs to make major organizational changes within the Wallaby management system very soon. If he does not and constructs himself as the central genius able to live with mediocre puppets underneath him, the Deans era will quickly look good in comparison (even though Link inherited a de-skilled, demotivated and rudderless team).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free