Where is the author getting his statistics from?
(thescore.com.au)
Code:
Runs Tackles (missed) Rucks
Mowen (80) 5 3 2 5
Hooper (80) 11 9 1 9
Palu (61) 12 5 1 11
I would be taking Scott Allen's analysis over those raw stats you've just quoted, as I'm sure based on his form that he would've sat through the match with a keen eye and made his own observations before writing that article..........
And those stats from The Score/Rugbystats etc are no way accurate........
For instance, Mowen made a lot more tackles than those 3 they've given him credit for....... over at ESPN they have him down as making double that, and while their numbers may not be correct they would be much closer to the truth........
Anyways, Scott's article reinforces a few things for me:
Mowen and Moore were excellent.......
Palu was not as bad as his detractors say he was, but certainly not as good as his fanbase believes.........