swingpass
Peter Sullivan (51)
Seven news reported that Speight would sign today. Silhouette looks like him. There's my bet.
reported as signing on with the Brumbies and ARU till 2018 this morning
Seven news reported that Speight would sign today. Silhouette looks like him. There's my bet.
Seems like Boudjellal may be resigned to not getting Quade, threatening to sue ARU for negotiating with him after he'd already signed (according to them) for Toulon:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/...stralian-rugby-union-over-quade-coopers-uturn
Seven news reported that Speight would sign today. Silhouette looks like him. There's my bet.
Does he actually have any grounds to sue? Or is he just being an angry Frenchman?Funny it never bothered him when he signed Sonny Bill.
Possibly, better legal minds than me might care to commentDoes he actually have any grounds to sue? Or is he just being an angry Frenchman?
The law is that someone cannot induce another person to breach their contract with a third party. This is the tort of inducing breach of contract.
The Federal Court described the tort by reference to an English case[1] as follows: 'Direct persuasion or procurement or inducement applied by the third party to the contract breaker, with knowledge of the contract and the intention of bringing about its breach . . '.
To show that the tort has been committed the claimant must show:
- That there was a persuasion or procurement or inducement by the defendant - merely advising someone to breach the contract is not enough. The defendant must be shown to have created the reason for breaking the contract, not just to have pointed out existing reasons to break the contract.
- That the defendant had an intention to bring about a breach contract - it is not enough that the defendant knew that a breach of contract would be a natural or probable consequence of its actions, nor is it enough that the defendant was indifferent to the effect on anyone else's contract.
You'd think the legal fees would be more than the damages as well - marketing and photo costs by all reports. In any cases, he won't have Quade on the feildStrewthcobber it's likely it muddies the waters that Cooper potentially would have been negotiating with the ARU before Toulon.
How can the ARU have created a reason to break the contract, if that reason is an offer that was potentially made prior to Quade signing with Toulon.
But also wouldn't the ARU need to be aware that Quade was under contract to be guilty of this? It was pretty murky the whole situation and nobody knows the full story.
Maybe after Khoder Nasser sends Toulon a cheque
As it should be.
As it should be.
But if the suggestions are right that they paid out the contract for Kane Douglas, then they're looking a bit stupid on their stance.
(perhaps unless he's on some sort of instalment repayment plan)
If reports of a 200,000 euro payment are true, Kane may not be playing for very much over the next couple of yearsor the payment (if any) was made out of future wages (who knows)
If reports of a 200,000 euro payment are true, Kane may not be playing for very much over the next couple of years
Great signing, but didn't the ARU have a rule that you had to sign for 7s for the complete year and not do anything else? Or has that rule changed or disappeared completely?
Speight is a proven Sevens player, apparently. That would make a big difference.
No doubt Geraint John would far prefer to have all his players available exclusively for Sevens, and in an ideal world that is what would happen.
Sadly, our rugby world is far from ideal. John needs players like Speight, with proven Sevens experience and proven ability at the very top level of the game, fifteens and Sevens.