I strongly believe the majority of GPS schools in QLD would have beaten all QLD teams in the JGC - having watched all centres play through the tourn I was disapointed at the standard. Watching the WA boys bully Orange was a very low point.
Early days, Nessie, early days.
As many are aware, I was a keen observer of WA's tour of Qld in 2014 (particularly the U17's).
Talking to a couple of the Brisbane coaches, it seems that they started training later, ran fewer weekly sessions and those GPS stars who did turn up, arrived only a few weeks prior to the first game. Certainly, in 2014, the WA boys seemed better drilled and fitter than most of the competition, although they were certainly looking tired and a bit ragged in the last game against a very competitive Brisbane Orange.
From what I hear, the situation was much the same this year.
To me that suggests that there is considerable potential for the big centre teams to improve their competitiveness with a more intensive approach.
In addition I don't think it is a problem that JGC isn't
eclipsing the GPS standard. What do we have? Is it 9 schools in Brisbane, 6 in Sydney playing at that standard?
Let's assume:
- U15's from earlier JGC years start feeding back into U17's
- The heartland teams from Sydney and Brisbane get sick of being "bullied" by ACT, Victoria and WA and apply greater focus and intensity to their preparation
- And the GPS boys continue to focus on 1st XV (as appears to be happening for the most part)
If all that happens is that the heartland teams achieve GPS
equivalency, then we go from 15 teams playing GPS level to maybe 25 teams. I believe that is a realistic goal as the competition develops and the systems get fine tuned.
Add on the benefits of wider talent identification reach, fostering rugby in regional centres and giving the developing states much needed competitive outlets and the potential is magnified for players, coaches and managers.
Finally to clear up a common misconception, I can't speak for Victoria and ACT but the WA teams are not "academy" teams. This link explains the process by which the squads are chosen:
http://rugbywa.com.au/junior-representatives
The number of boys who receive regular "academy" training is very small.
That being said, RugbyWA seems to take this competition very seriously and can focus all of their attention on just 2 teams which must be an advantage.
The ARU could, of course, reduce this advantage by funding another 60 WA coaches, managers and players to tour in 2016. I wouldn't complain about 2 additional squads from WA getting the opportunity.