I would like to officially confirm here that I have not put in an expression of interest into having a NRC team. This is mainly due to the fact that I didn't win the $70M lotto last year.
Does this mean I can celebrate my birthday tomorrow and then the ARU will be holding a second celebration for me on Saturday?
Awesome! I like this alternative ARU calendar.
But did anyone here submit any suggested law changes? I recall that the Pulveriser came out with that at the start of the process, but nothing more has been heard.
EDIT: Although I note that it was one of the dot points in the EOI form.
Introduce innovative new formats and laws to re-kindle excitement in the game.
http://myrugby.rugby.com.au/myrugby/images/2014_NRC_EOI.pdf
I'd have thought so. And I think that the Pulveriser is on the IRB and maybe even on the laws committee.Won't/wouldn't that require IRB approval?
" 'Won't somebody please think of the Shute Shield!?' "
I'd be surprised if the ARU have given SS much thought at all. The NSWRU have given it little thought for the past 20 years.
I know that people have had a go at proving the Shute will be dead and buried by the NRC
Won't/wouldn't that require IRB approval?
I'd have thought so. And I think that the Pulveriser is on the IRB and maybe even on the laws committee.
I wonder what the IRB think about "re-kindling excitement" as from what I know Australia is the only place that this is required.
Bill Pulver explained on Rugby HQ last year that they are able to make changes for internal competitions without IRB approval. Once you get to International level the IRB must rule.
I know that people have had a go at proving the Shute will be dead and buried by the NRC but I just don't get it. Unless 3T sucks out all the money from the Shute teams (the only doomsday scenario I can see) then the competitions will not be in direct competition. Shute will be over in August, without the deluge of Super rugby players that significantly distorts the competition (that's a positive improvement). 3T starts in September and finishes in October. That means they will complement each other.
If the rumours are true all the Shute teams want to get involved in the NRC in some way as they see it as a logical progression from where they are. In my opinion the dangers of 3T revolve around financing it without losing a huge bundle of money. Shute is likely to survive and prosper under this scenario, not be destroyed by it.
I think we should be pushing for players to play when possible, not prevent them from playing.
And it would seem counter-productive to have different laws for 3rd Tier than for 4th, 2nd and 1st Tier. How would 3T provide a pathway from 4T to 2T if it's played under different laws?I guess that's the problem with not having enough lawyers on the ARU Board:
View attachment 4357
And it would seem counter-productive to have different laws for 3rd Tier than for 4th, 2nd and 1st Tier. How would 3T provide a pathway from 4T to 2T if it's played under different laws?
The different laws thought buble is/was the most dangerous part of the whole thing as far as I can see.
I can't recall. Was the SS played under the EVLs when the ARC was on?And it would seem counter-productive to have different laws for 3rd Tier than for 4th, 2nd and 1st Tier. How would 3T provide a pathway from 4T to 2T if it's played under different laws?
The different laws thought buble is/was the most dangerous part of the whole thing as far as I can see.
All sports have boring matches and thrilling matches and tinkering with the laws won't change that. If anyone thinks that a law change will eliminate boring rugby matches, they are going to be disappointed.If its the ones he was suggesting it seems counter productive.
But I come back to my hobby horse: no new followers are going to be attracted by an assurance that a change to law x is going to produce a game to their liking so dont bother.
I'm fairly certain it was. ELVs were certainly played in SS for one season.I can't recall. Was the SS played under the EVLs when the ARC was on?